 phishpond417 (294), Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
May 14, 2008 Besides the little if no aroma this beer has, and its pretty much lifeless body, I would have to say this tolerable Canadian swill. Clear golden, white top, pretty firm malted flavor with stale hops in the finish.
daknole (309), Plantation, Florida, USA
May 8, 2008 I am shocked this beer gets rated above a 2. I can hardly find it any better than our worst beers in America. Smells and tastes horrible.
spikester (257), Salem, Oregon, USA
Apr 25, 2008 Pours deep gold with a 2" white head and fair amount of lacings.
Aroma is corny and metallic.
Good malty flavor with hops having a minor role. Very similar flavor profile to Coors regular though not identical. Wouldn’t turn down a freebie!
arventresca (66), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
Apr 23, 2008 Pours clear and a hint darker than golden. Smells skunky. Taste like your typical macro. Drinkable but not stellar.
Wulfstan (397), California, USA
Apr 21, 2008 Updated: May 15, 2008This is a decent, basic lager that clearly beats most (but not all) of the basic US macro lagers. However, to me it ranks a little below Moosehead, Pabst Blue Ribbon, and Miller High Life.
It’s gold, a bit on the more bubbly side, with a long-lasting medium, white head. The aroms ia pleasant if nothing great - honey, alcohol, corn, hay, dust, and seems rather sweet and a litle perfumy. It’s somewhat like Country Club Malt Liquor. The atset is basically light sweet grain, mostly corn and cooked rice, with a light bitterness that has only a slight perfumy quality. It’s a bit on the thin side but drinkable.
|
