bodo111 (12), a, Texas, USA
Feb 19, 2008 i think the contents is 99.9% water. the other .1% is a cheap beer strained throught an old sock.
glennj (25), Australia
Dec 19, 2007 Oh this is bad stuff...........do they still make it? I had the misfortune of tasting it when it was released and never again....horrible, should be banned
 Thylacine (230), Tasmania, Australia
Jul 23, 2007 Some say they’d, "rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy", but this stuff will make them reconsider. Extremely pale, watery, insipid and weak.
jkm (189), Australia
Jul 23, 2007 Bottle. Pale yellow in colour with a thin white head. Thin bodied and highly carbonated. Watery and flavourless. Fizzy mouthfeel. Boring and Bland. Terrible.
motelpogo (4391), Plzen, Czech Republic
May 10, 2006 canned. couldn’t be a whole lot worse - flavourless, very fizzy, yellow, some chemical nasties. dang
bluevegie (2052), Perth, Australia
Sep 6, 2005 Light straw body, poor head, sweet and boring, a little bit smoother and a little bit sweeter than the gold, lacing, vanilla malt, head lasted well. Hopefully they wont bring this across to W.A.
mullet (795), Melbourne, Australia
Sep 21, 2004 Weird, dull, tinny colour with a clumpy head which formed a shape which looked like a crumpled up used condom - looks like they’re using chemical heading agents to me. Very little aroma, but there was a faint tomato sauce tinge to it. Very watery flavour with a hint of brown sugar and apples. No hop character at all. A bit fizzy and bloating. It’s no good, but it’s hardly offensive. Frankly I was expecting more (less?)
mutant (854), Melbourne, Australia
Mar 30, 2004 Looks like a beer for 5 seconds then the head disintigrates. Tastes absolutely diabolical, really nasty. Needed a quick single straight to mid off to get away from 487. Nearly got run out.
|
