 kp (8399), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Sep 1, 2007 Updated: Mar 8, 2009
Date: October 20, 2005
Mode: Bottle
Source: Tasting
Appearance: clear light amber
Aroma: light sweet malt aroma with a touch of hops
Flavor: light hop flavor on a dry malt base, light bitter finish, plain, too much bitterness for the malt
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 10/20
Rating: 2.6/5.0
Score: *4
Name: Restoration Pale Ale
Date: February 23, 2009
Mode: Bottle
Source: Riverside, Chattanooga
Appearance: hazy orange, fine off white head with sudsy edges, streaks of drippy lace
Aroma: dry pale malt aroma, lots of floral hops
Flavor: well balanced flavor, lots of floral and earthy hops keeps the malt pretty dry
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 7/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 6/10; Overall: 11/20
Rating: 2.8/5.0
Drinkability: 6/10
Score: *4
FROTHINGSLOSH (2001), GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Aug 15, 2007 Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a dark amber color with a large orange-white head. The aroma was sweet fruity hops. The flavor was sweetish with a moderate yet somehow subdued fruity hop presence. The body was fairly light. A nice session ale but nothing more.
HopheadHans (755), Bay Area, California, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 11, 2007 Bottle. This one is decidely average. Not much to say about it. It pours with a pale golden color, displays some hoppy aroams together with malts and some citrus. The citrus is also most dominant in the flavor department and the body is fairly watery. All right but not memorable.
gotohelunc (473), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 9, 2007 Bottle. Mild, faint aroma of citrus and yeast. A touch cloudy, golden color with a decent white head. Nothing bad in this yeasty/hoppy flavor, touch of fruit, muted hops, and a few grains. Not a deep flavor, more designed to be smooth and refreshing than overly interesting or memorable. Not an unique brew, but a solid session beer that’d be good on a hot day.
jetzler (622), oklahoma city, Oklahoma, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Aug 7, 2007 Bottle, slightly cloudy appearance, with a thin head, thin watery taste. Hmm this beer was to help restore the Gulf Coast, maybe they should get some help restoring this beer. Not very good not horrific but honestly nothing special at all.
masonjer (564), Holt, Michigan, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 11/20 |
Aug 3, 2007 This beer was just sort of there. Very uninspiring. Small hops, little bit of citrus, golden ale with not much taste. Refreshing, maybe good with a meal, but nothing great.
keepersj12 (798), Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 |
Jul 31, 2007 Nice aroma. Very light and refreshing. Extra credit for the worthy cause helping New Orleans recover.
ucusty (1886), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 29, 2007 Poured beautiful golden amber hue....from bottle. Great white head and carbonation. Wonderful lacing. Aroma is sage and sandlewood. Very soapy on the finish. This would be nicer if it was dry hopped. Lost alot respect for this beer as soon as i twisted of the cap. WTF?
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)