 Louipa (121), USA
Mar 12, 2007
Its barely beer, but strangely thats not all that bad a thing. Faint hops smell. Almost no bitterness. Light malt flavor. But still much better tasting than any BMC. Unfortunately the 3.5% alc. makes me never wanna pay for this again. But good with food. Good when you want to not get too drunk.
WakeandBake (148), Greenville, Michigan, USA
Nov 2, 2008 Bottle.Poured a pale gold with a moderate head,lots of carbonation. A grainy,corn aroma with a faint wiff of hops. Some flavor,little malt,little hops,with a crisp finish,thin body,kind of watery. Not bad for a light beer,but kind of steep in price, Drinkable
killjoy966 (108), USA
Oct 31, 2008 Probably looks like a pale yellow, but I couldn’t tell because I left it in the bottle. Smells like nothing, tastes like fizzy water. This is not beer, this is a travesty.
OldMrCrow (1057), Seattle, Washington, USA
Oct 30, 2008 Bottle.
<br /><br />
Why is it that the friggin Ritz-Carlton can’t come up with anything closer to beer than Amstel Light?
<br /><br />
Lightest, wateriest, tasteless-est crap I’ve had in a while. Nothing...nasty about it. It’s just barely even there.
SkyCop32 (139), Morlautern, Germany
Oct 29, 2008 The pours a lite gold with a little white head and no aroma to speak of. This has very little taste and this is why there aren’t many calories.
AgentSteve (919), SF Bay Area, California, USA
Oct 29, 2008 IMO, this isn’t all that bad of a beer. Especially for the caloric intake factor. Drinkable and a bit bitter, but definitely drinkable.
|
