roacheater (36), USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Oct 30, 2004 skunklet aroma teased me well, appearance was good - as long as it stayed in that snappy green bottle, flavor was a cut above garbage (albeit, very tasty garbage), palate... i don’t need no stinking palate!, overall impression - goes down great with "The Last Picture Show."
 labattblueleaf (225), Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 4/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 25, 2004 I love the commercial description for this beer. "We challenged our top brewmasters..." blah, blah, blah. Stop right there. Your top brewmasters should be serving this swill to the patrons on the Titanic........at the bottom of the Atlantic. Would you like to spend $5.00 or so on a six pack of this? I have a better idea. Take the $5.00 out of your wallet and wipe your ass with it to get more satisfaction than actually drinking it. This is an overly-skunked, flavorless (except the scent and flavor of Pepe Le Pew), worthless beer. Odeed (the previous rater) got it right when he called it the "Heineken" taste with a "bud" aftertaste. Next time someone orders this, just spend the next 8 minutes licking a urinal. Same effect. Tsarman and jine have two of the funniest ratings I’ve seen in a while. Hey! At least they got 4 points for having an alright bottle. Should have been 3 points because it wasn’t that cool but I really felt sorry for the 10 jackasses who call themselves brewmasters who conceived this crap.
Odeed (1675), Bakersfield, California, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Oct 19, 2004 so a.b. is trying to step up to the plate eh?well they pretty much struck out.starts out with the "heineken" taste and then drops a nast "bud" aftertaste.yuck.
DerBiermeister (516), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Oct 18, 2004 I second Enniskillen’s assertion (see below) that the aroma is similar to Heineken. I would further assert that it smells like St. Pauli Girl too. The flavour is decent, mild, smooth, and diplomatic. It caters to the man who likes his beer with his golf...I think? Personally I think it’s better than Heineken - but neither one’s really great. I don’t really care.
pantani (1902), Salinas, California, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Oct 17, 2004 Updated: Oct 18, 2004Decent mass market lager. Aroma is similar to heineken, but with more pine. Body is light, but beer isn’t as watery. I would rather drink this then Bud Light... but that’s not really a compliment.
BruceLeroy (77), North Dakota, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Oct 13, 2004 How is this different than Heineken? The answer is.............it’s not.......same crap.
tsarman (794), Northern, New Jersey, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Oct 10, 2004 How many Budweiser brewmasters does it take to make a shitty beer? I would have thought 1, but now we know the answer could also be 10. Jine sums up my feelings exactly.
Darkover (1313), Columbus, Ohio, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Oct 8, 2004 Bright yellow with a white head. Some skunk at first, then a toastie malt aroma. Flavor is sweet. Not too bad.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)