 Dorwart (1831), Robbinsville, New Jersey, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 13, 2004 Draft. Thin head with great carbonation. Light hoppy aroma with a hint of spices. Color is a medium gold. Well balanced flavor between the malt and hops. Bitter and dry finish that leaves the mouth clean. Well, it is better than regular Budweiser.
Turtboy (120), Lucasville, Ohio, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 12, 2004 I bought this beer at a gas station, while looking for my usual macro. It had a very nice looking bottle, and it was strategically placed next to heineken. We I got home I was suprised to find it had a very nice aroma, and very smooth going down. It tasted a lot like Heineken, but not as bitter aftertaste. I was surprised to find a nice lager coming from Anheuser-Busch. Not my favorite beer, but drinkable.
heemer77 (4312), Savannah, Missouri, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Apr 11, 2004 Updated: Feb 23, 2005I ordered this on tap since I refuse to buy a whole six-pack. I am convinced that all they did was run lines from the Bud kegs to the green tap. This stuff starts with a very light hops and malt scent. The flavor has lots of corn and a little sweetness. I would be hard pressed to say this is much different from most macro lagers. Don’t waste your money on this overrated swill. I could barely finish my glass.
bigdogbrewing (9), Delaware, Ohio, USA
does not count  | 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Apr 10, 2004 Rating this as an american lager. Not
my style preference, but was given a bottle to evaluate. Skunked! Probably on purpose to compete with Heineken in a green bottle. Some slight vegetable notes like celery or even beets from the sulfides in the nose. (acceptable for style) Appearance is bright and clean, pale straw color, no head retention no lace (again ok for stlye). Flavor: low malt, but what is there is grainy. Low hop flavor and low bitterness. Just enough bitterness to make it finish clean and dry. No lingering bitterness. All ok for style but not my preference. Beer is refreshing and thin. Carbonation is high and sharp and prickly on the tongue. Overall I am not impressed. Its just another beer. Albeit it is a good example of the style, but just not my preference of beer. Beer is clean and refreshing. No significant off flavors. I fault this beer for the skunked nose which turns me off! I am convinced it is done on purpose to compete with Heineken.
Jayson2425 (167), Box Elder, South Dakota, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Apr 10, 2004 It is diffently the best looking beer out there. I also like the taste. Nice lager.
ckramer99 (7), Ames, Iowa, USA
does not count | 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
Apr 7, 2004 Christ, you people are hard to convince, this stuff isn't bad at all for a full flavored lager and definetely up there with Heineken. I'm diggin' it !
CapFlu (3494), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 5, 2004 (Bottle) At the Glass Onion in Canton, NY. Admitting that over ten brewmasters developed this beer is like Yugo revealing that it took more than one stylist to give its car its great look? This beer pours a medium, white head and a clear gold body. Skunked nose. Flavour is thin, uncomplex with hints of malt. Underwhelming beer from the King of Marketing?
DUbrew (49), Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Apr 5, 2004 Get yourself a real world lager, this stuff is crap. Nothing but stale budweiser. What Anheuser's brewmasters/ advertising department come up with next?
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)