RateBeer
Arcadia Battle Creek Special Reserve 2.81 41

Arcadia Battle Creek Special Reserve

Percentile
29
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
412.81/5.02.81/5.04.7%27.6English pint, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Our lightest ale, Battle Creek Special reserve is an English Golden Mild. The lightly toasted, semisweet, malt character finishes crisp and is balanced by a mild hop bitterness and delicate Cascade hop nose.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 ClarkVV (3578), Allston, Massachusetts, USA
4.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/59/104/518/20
May 10, 2004  
Bottled November 2003, sampled May 2004. The bottle from 2003 listed an ABV of 4.25% Needless to say, I was quite worried as to whether such a low gravity beer could have made it 6 months on a warm, well-lit store’s shelves. To my delight, the beer was bottle conditioned and had ample yeast floating around, as well as a thick ring around the bottom. Upon opening, it had a wonderful, deep herb-like hops smell. I really enjoy tettnangs, so that was a big surprise. The hops aroma was complemented by moderately sweet english toffee notes and a bit of a kick from the yeast. Pouring revealed a golden-amber, quite bright and clouded, with some warmer bright red hues and a big, creamy off-white head. Plenty of lacing. Upon drinking, I was impressed with the mix of hops and malt. Neither too dry, not too sweet, this beer seemed to have integrated everything in a perfect balance during its 6 month warm rest. Spiciness from the hops, and a nutty almost chewy malt flavor as well. A touch of vanilla, more herbal qualities and a very crisp yeast/hops finish. Body was medium, and for a beer of such low gravity, that was impressive. No thinning. Low carbonation, lots of chewy toffee as it warmed on the finish and almost a butter-cream sweetness as well. This was truly a gem and one that blew my expectations to pieces. To be constructive, it did begin to get a bit too heavy on the cream-like sweetness as it finished and I had my second one. There was a bit too much carbonation upon first opening (but to be expected).


 daboskabouter (1470), Fergus, Ontario, Canada
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/102/54/102/56/20
Jan 13, 2003  
They didn’t have this on tap while I was there, so the waitress brought me one in a bottle (the service was excellent by the way). Oh man, special reserve, cen’t wait to try this beer, you’d think I would know by now. Pale golden color. Spritzy, oily with a slight hop finish and nothing more to speak of. This breweries worst beer.


 Schroppfy (1813), Ohio, USA
3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/56/102/512/20
Dec 31, 2002  
Ain’t a half-bad EPA. Quite malty of exactly the right tangy type. Pretty smooth. Seemingly sugary or adjuncty at the finish. Thus concludes Beer #666 for me, sign of the beast! On to the resoulution beer for #667!


 hopscotch (5531), Vero Beach, Florida, USA
3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/104/511/20
Dec 25, 2002  
Lightly malty and lightly floral nose. Hints of caramel, fuzzy fruit and light perfume. Crystal clear amber color with a medium-sized, fizzy white head. Mostly lasting with decent lacing. Very well balanced with soft carbonation and a creamy mouthfeel. Medium-bodied. Short, dry, grassy finish.


 Gunshy (479), Ohio, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/56/103/514/20
Nov 28, 2002  
This beer poured a golden color and created a white head that left some lace as it subsided. Some carbonation was present. It had an aroma of of hops and grain. The flavor was mostly of hops with a slight sweetness to it. The finish was light and a touch on the dry side. Not a bad beer, but not one of their better ones.


 JCW (1262), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/55/103/514/20
Oct 22, 2002  
I also found this in the bargin bin. It’s a fair ale. Fair aroma, fair appearance, good malty taste. Pretty good beer.


 Panzuriel (995), Westerville, Ohio, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/57/103/513/20
Aug 26, 2002  
A surprisingly good beer I found in the Bargain bin at one of my haunts. a Nice aroma, good appearance and good texture round out this beer which has a great malty flavor that is full and wonderful. Very good beer.


 hennes (932), Fountain, Michigan, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/53/101/54/20
Jan 19, 2002  
Yikes. This stuff is noxious as hell, to the point I couldnt finish the bottle. Seriosuly, something went ary in the brewing as this has a serious taste of sweat - big time acridity. There are serious chunks flaoting in it, too, which is intriguing until you taste the stuff and wonder what the hell they are.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC