 keepersj12 (816), Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
May 30, 2009 Back in the day this was good stuff. Back in the 60’s that is. Big sponsor of the Phillies. Why don’t they just retire these old labels. The big boys can’t do them justice. Just another crappy Miller product
maniac (2628), Richmond, Virginia, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Mar 24, 2009 Can courtesy of Numenor on 02/15/2009. Clear pale yellow body with a medium frothy white head. Sweet corn and honey aroma with some spicy hints. Sweet corn flavor, some faint honey and slight malty notes. Medium body with moderate carbonation.
jimmack34 (570), Lancaster, Ohio, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Mar 3, 2009 Bottle. Smells skunky and stale. Tastes like corn meal and skunky. Pretty sour.
italianjohn (392), Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Feb 19, 2009 A classic when you talk to old timers they say its a shadow of its former self i’ve seen the sign in pictures of old connie mack stadium of the scoreboard ... ok enough of the nostalgia its a common boring macro taste slightly skunky smell yet very drinkable little head golden with a slightly malty finish an oldie but not really a goodie i’d do it again though because its not really offensive
blipp (1748), Newark, New Jersey, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Feb 12, 2009 Ha ha. Once again I’m fooled into drinking macro malt water. Pours yellow with a white head. The aroma is awful, skunky adjucts and old sucks. I was actually a bit hesitant to put my glass to my lips, but the flavor isn’t nearly as offensive, in fact it’s on the tasteless side. Malty adjuncts still come through. All things considered, this is actually drinkable, but if you’re looking for something with this sort of flavor profile, there are certainly more cost effective and tastier options available.
AdamSkillin (376), High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jan 23, 2009 Okay, nobody thought this was going to be good. It’s not, but it really isn’t as bad as it could be for its price. I’ve seen beers cost more than this and have way more adjunct off-flavors and waterier taste. It’s a last resort beer, but not the worst of them by any stretch.
Jhouston (23), New Jersey, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Jan 18, 2009 A typical American Ale. Though Ale is my least favorite style of beer,is why I rate it and others of the same genre pretty low!
btree (14), New York, New York, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 7, 2009 From the can: little skunk to the hops, mild bitter aftertase, little to no aroma, decent carbonation, just a hint of lacing (which is good), I think this beer is ok. I’d drink another one. Not as good as the IPA or so my father tells me. Still it was worth trying out.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)