Kevin (1918), Colorado, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Apr 30, 2005 light orange tinted amber with almost no head. sweet toffee aroma that is not really inviting. gummy mouthfeel, really leaves a tree sap feel. grainy taste with some light burnt hop. finish is caramle with some charcoal. Nuffield (2724), Roseville, Minnesota, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Apr 13, 2005 Ah, so this is a California Common. I had no idea what a "Gold Rush Style" would be. I like the label’s "Iceless Fermentation" banner. I don’t know that much about brewing, much less lagers, and I know that the claim to fame of the style is the warmer temperature brewing of a lager, but since when did lagers ever have to have ice? The beer is pretty plain on the whole, but it does have just a ton of malt character, with a strong caramel flavor and some fruit notes. Slightly hoppy but a surprisingly thin body with a touch of grass and metal in the finish. Vibrant copper color. Thanks to Markus for passing this along. LilKem (1210), Marietta, Ohio, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Apr 8, 2005 my first of a new style! malty, hops, yeasty and little else going on. however, its a good session beer is what my notes say, which is a term i think i stole from mike however a few of the previous raters seem to agree. Enormo (25), Davenport, Iowa, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Apr 2, 2005 I can honestly say that I have never heard of this style before. And I wasn’t very impressed with it. Came across as very thin with a slight fruitiness. Could make for a good session or starter beer. Palidor19 (1785), Brandon, Florida, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Mar 5, 2005 I really liked this beer, Nice balance of malt and hops, had a great subtle taste of caramel. very good social setting beer Vac (2394), San Diego, California, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 10/20 | Feb 17, 2005 This brew pours with an amber body topped by a thin head with some lacing. The aroma is slighlty bitter, woody and hoppy with a slight underlying maltiness. The flavor is slightly sweet and malty with a slight grassy hoppiness. Light to medium bodied and smooth. TheRimmer (483), Florida, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 14/20 | Jan 18, 2005 Eh nice lil beer. nothing revolutionary, but not a slouch either. Pretty plain flavors, but with some exuberance. Bready, slightly bitter. Jedsbrew (465), Rhineland, Missouri, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/20 | Jan 11, 2005 Copper hue, fast disappearing head and a muted aroma-malty, a little spice with maybe some bubblegum. Light bodied, the flavor was weak as was the carbonation-lightly fruity with some caramel, a hint of sourness and a short finish. Supposably a "steam" style beer, this one could definitely use some tweaking.
|