RateBeer
Barley Creek Helles Mai Bock 3.26 4

Barley Creek Helles Mai Bock


 Percentile 

Requires
more ratings

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
43.47/5.03.26/5.0-0Lager glass, Shaker, Stein
Commercial Description:
Again another big beer! This brew has a lightly sweet malty flavor. The Hop is Hallertau.
 Phatz (225), Paradise, Pennsylvania, USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/58/104/514/20
Aug 2, 2006  
Appearance: Served a golden orange color with a frothy cap. Smell: Sweet honey Munich malt aroma. A hint of grain and some sugar. Nice. Taste: A smooth lightly spiced sweet malty flavor in the mouth is remarkably easy going. Extremely quaffable, slightly reserved flavor with only a subtle floral green showing up in the finish of this balanced sweet relaxed beer. Mouthfeel: Creamy and smooth around the edge and remarkably slick and juicy through the center. Drinkability: This beer sits very lightly. It is an easy drinking very good Miabock I highly recommend this on-tap at Barley Creek. Well done! Hope this is helpful. Cheers!


 beerbill (1973), Laurel, New York, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/57/103/513/20
Jul 6, 2005  
On tap at the brewery. Nice deep golden color with a moderate whitish head. Slightly sweet, which is expected in a spring bock. Nice malt flavor with some hop bitterness.


 JFURYCAT (792), East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA
3.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/103/516/20
May 14, 2005    Updated: May 21, 2008
Rerate: Its now called Mountaneer Maibock Lager which doesn’t make any sense. This year it has a lot of sourness and the alcohol can be found in a bite in the flavor. The aroma seems less existent. I think something happened with temperatures during fermentation. Rerate 5-6-07 Its still an easy drinker but this year it seems more crisp and the flavor is more assertive than the product they made before. The malty fruit qualities seem more pronounced and its sweeter. My rating just climbed. A friend of mine has a keg of this every spring. ************************************* Ri now this beer has its devotees hitting the Creek for it. People were talking about it for weeks before it came out. It had virtually no head and barely any aftertaste to it. It had a distinct malty flavor with a slight sting to my tongue (must be the hop doing that). It was clear and clean with a nice finish. I had this on tap. 5-17-06 rerating. They’ve refined this one. The slight hoppy bitterness is still here but the malty flavor balances out much more nicely in a more plesant mouthfeel.


 Prostman (1077), Pennsylvania, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/104/58/104/515/20
Jun 15, 2004  
This was a nice attempt at the style. It poured a deep golden color with a thin white head. The taste was malty with just a subtle hint of hops. A nice beer to drink any time of year.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC