 DTM (541), Winters, California, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Jan 20, 2008 Updated: Dec 22, 2008Great beer!! Goes down smooth and has a slightly nutty flavor. Not much of a head. One of my all time favorites.
Gregis (1135), Shawnee, Kansas, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 19, 2008 Pours a clear, pale copper with a loose, ivory head. The nose is of pale, bready malt with a slightly phenolic note in the background. The mouthfeel is fairly light-bodied and thin with a clean but lightly metallic finish. The flavor is of bready, pale malt, a touch of caramel and a bit of a dry plastic at the quick finish. This is a decent transition beer, easily available just about anywhere and with a better flavor profile than the typical macro lager. In comparison to other examples of this style, however, this is an entirely mediocre brew.
thenumber1g (69), Cary, North Carolina, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 5/5 | 13/20 |
Jan 17, 2008 Very good beer, one of the best I have tried in a long while. Light on the hops but very malty!
timfoolery (484), California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jan 14, 2008 More malt taste than hops, as in typical pale ales, but this one satified with a smooth palate and subtle hops. It’s a pretty good brew at a party, or a familiy function.
shackinetics (132), Florida, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jan 13, 2008 brownish amber with fair amount of dense white head. Not much to the nose, with a medium build and what I can only describe as a very peppery taste. Heavy on malt, low on hops. Okay stuff when there’s nothing tastier around at the sports bar
darkguardian (506), Florida, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jan 13, 2008 A good beer, fairly common to find on tap. Some bitterness but no more than I expected from what it is. Not alot of hops but the malt presence is there. Has a fairly prominent yeasty or biscuity note. Much better from the tap than from the bottle.
SHANER4 (386), Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jan 10, 2008 12oz bottle - Poured light copper or caramel color with medium head. Really a nice looking beer, very good carbonation. I could smell malt, slight hop and fruity scent. Tasted yeast on palate with a weak hop finish, also slightly dry. Overall a decent beer but not overly impressed.
FROTHINGSLOSH (2038), GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Jan 6, 2008 I was surprised to find that I had not rated this one. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a bronze-amber color with a medium sized white head. The aroma was sour, tangy - a bit skunky and had a dry floral hop presence. The flavor was tangy, bitter and had a moderate floral hop presence. The finish was tangy, bitter and tasted a bit off. Sadly this rating of the bottle gets better scores that I would give the draft which I have had a time or two in the past when I have forgotten that while this is named Bass they really should have left the "B" out of the name.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)