 MrManning (1652), London, Ontario, Canada
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Mar 28, 2006 Sparkling gold liquid topped by a fizzy and active white head. Some lace. Good pilsner hop aroma with mild bread, but followed by some skunk. Crisp and hoppy, with mild malt sweetness following. Just seems to ba lacking a little bit. Overall a decent average drinker. Can 500ml- LCBO purchase.
GG (1646), NorCal, California, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
May 22, 2006 Well, nothing horrible here and nothing fantastic either. This beer really can swing either way depending on how it was stored. Luckily, I seemed to have gotten a decent bottle because it was quite enjoyable and quite drinkable. I think it’s on the same page as a Tuborg (not quite as tasty) and much better the Heineken, Grolsch, Oranjeboom or other lagers from that region. Aroma was a bit malty with lots of rice coming thru. Appearance was a clear golden with a nice white head. Mouthfeel was a little harsh with average amounts of carbonation and a bit on the thin side. Flavor was grassy, malty, a bit sweet, quite crisp and quite refreshing! If I was throwing a party and wanted to maximize my dollar/beer/quality ratio then this really would do nicely!
jerohen (1614), Bussum, Netherlands
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jul 2, 2003 Updated: Dec 14, 2003Clear golden colour, medium head. Skunky aroma. Flavour is ok, bit hoppy, not too sweet, pleasant bitterness. Typical pilsener. Really, really cheap.
Doggythedog (1591), Split, Croatia
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 14, 2004 Updated: Jun 16, 2007This was once (quite some time ago) my favorite beer. Why ? It’s foreign, it has a plain but maybe enjoyable taste, and everyone else said it was great. Now I know better. And it seems that those people who were "everyone else" know better too. A passable mass produced pils. Rated Premium Pils accidentaly before... copied the review here and deleted the other one.
jpm30 (1588), East Central, Georgia, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 14, 2006 From a 12 oz. slender narrow neck green bottle with a coded freshness date on the back label. Made a good appearance, poured a clear pale golden with a nice white fluffy head, good carbonation. Had a good dry grassy aroma with hints of lemon and honey. A crisp, slick light bodied mouth feel, above average drinkability. Had a good sweet, dry grassy and grainy taste, a sweet mild bitterness, and a dry grainy finish.
legion242 (1585), Richardson, Texas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 3, 2004 A quite nice continental Lager. Satnds up well against your other standards- Stella, Hieneken, etc. I see it on sale around here all the time, sometimes for as little as $8 for 12. Great "pool" beer.
Saarlander (1579), Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Jan 15, 2007 Gold pour, lightly hopped, Malty, on the sweetish side, but very drinkable, average brew.
JonMoore (1561), Loughborough, Leicestershire, England
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 26, 2005 Can. Golden colour with a slim white head. Aroma of malts. taste of malts with some hops. Not bad.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)