 jason (1624), Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 17, 2006 Bottle. Barely a aroma and a thin pour left this to be sitting flat in my glass. Flavor is decently balanced but lacks of any real flavor. Not too bad of a beer but not really worth trying again.
StueyD (590), King’s Lynn, Norfolk, Norfolk, England
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Nov 14, 2006 A pale yellow coloured beer, fizzy, with a frothy white head. a metallic hop nose, slightly zesty. The taste is dry, a mild metallic hop flavour that becomes dull as the beer warms up. This has to be served well chilled to be anything like drinkable! A typical example of mass produced “B.Y.L. - Boring Yellow Liquid!” (Bottle - Prezzo restaurant, King’s Lynn, Norfolk).
Slacks (487), Bolton, Ontario, Canada
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Nov 13, 2006 Bottle: My candidate in the election lost tonight, I didn’t deserve anything better. Pours yellow, carbonated, head-free. Aroma is almost non-existent.. it is my belief it once stood near a malt or two and the scent has clung to its jacket. Flavour is notably corn free, but so pale and bland I’ve forgotten it already. So I’ll just make it up.. it.. umm.. it’s "notably bland". Yes, that’s it. Notably bland.
Gethinbeer (1006), Nova Scotia, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Nov 11, 2006 From bottle. Typical lager aroma. Clear blonde in appearance, medium carb. Thin in guts and lacks flavour. Dull. I wanna forget about this beer, Ive got a head ache.
swanmann (309), Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Oct 24, 2006 Poured very bright clear gold, with highly carbonated, quickly diminishing white head. Mild aroma of hops and grain, a little skunky. The flavor is off balanced; yeast with weak hops. Skimpy.
beerintervals (2), Tucson, Arizona, USA
does not count  | 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 23, 2006 Tried this at a local Italian restaurant. Could not tell a difference between this and Heineken. Not at all a good beer.
MadIndian (997), Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 22, 2006 Sampled with Stegosaurus and Beerded_one at Newtown Beerfest. Pale golden pour with a fast diminishing medium white head, aroma of corn, and skunkiness, taste is also skunky and watery.
EithCubes (2166), Indiana, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 16, 2006 Bottle. Lively pour, both with the darting creamy beige head and the strong visible carbonation. Yellow. Cheap grassy and somewhat malty nose, strong sweetness. Thin and watery, much more sweetness than bitterness, slightly malty, clean. Dry, slightly cardboardy aftertaste, still one of the better beers to be ranked under ’Pale Lager’ on this site, and far from unpleasant.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)