 Damico (181), Norristown, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Jun 8, 2008 This was a really nice deep brown color for a lager. The toasted name seems to give it a long, smooth, and rich after taste that separates this from other lagers for me. You could definitely put down a few of these in one evening, espeically up in Long Island.
chrissy (122), Connecticut, USA
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 18/20 |
Jun 8, 2008 Draft: Pours a copper color with white foamy head. Has a toasted smell and a dry finish. A bit of a bitter aftertaste.
estoppel (1028), Buffalo, New York, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Jun 2, 2008 Bottle. Light amber body, small white head, nose like a helles. Bitter, some vegetal notes. Yuck.
Rciesla (3770), Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
May 26, 2008 Bottle. Pours a dark golden body with brown hues. Aroma is toasted malt, some hop character, and some spiciness. The malt flavor does come through in a toasty nutty way. interesting but not for me.
Heathen (810), Riverside, New Jersey, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
May 23, 2008 THOUGHTS: I’m really behind on inputting my ratings. I had this one for the Super Bowl. It reminded me more of an ESB than a lager. Not great, but different than most lagers I’ve tried.
TECHNICAL: Bottle. Poured a clear, dark yellow to light orange with a small, slightly off-white head that kept a thin sheet and left fair lacing. The aroma was moderate toasted and caramel malt and light to moderate grass hops. The initial flavor was lightly acidic and bitter; while the finish was lightly to moderately sweet, moderately bitter and slightly sour with an average duration. The flavor was toasted malt then some grassy hops followed by a little sweet malt and a touch of sourness. The light to medium body was somewhat dry with fizzy carbonation and a slightly metallic and light to moderate astringent finish.
beerbuzzmontreal (2921), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
May 22, 2008 The pour reveals an orange amber color with a thick, bubbly white head. Pleasant aroma of toasted malt and caramel. The flavor is quite good and sharp, there’s a definite toasted malt character along with some shy caramel, the malt feels also astringent, husky as they say. The body is medium with a creamy texture and medium to lively carbonation. This is a very interesting vienna but it would be even better if the astringent feeling would be toned down a bit.
mansquito (838), Boston/Philadelphia, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
May 11, 2008 Big foamy head... amber body. Nice toasted smell... malty, a little winy smell in there too I think. Tastes pretty nice. Not as sweet as many other viennas. A little sour close to the finish. Slightly metallic aftertaste.
Pwn3d (1087), Manhattan, New York, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
May 4, 2008 Updated: May 19, 2008Free sample at Mo’s in Fairfield. Good beer, little bit of a dry finish. Noticable use of hops, and nuts. . A little bigger than your run of the mill lager.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)