 Sonicdescent (382), Donora, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 10/20 |
Feb 12, 2009 Very nice in the appearance department with a nice frothy head, smells great, just a bit watery and average once you get past that.
ucfknightscott (46), Casselberry, Florida, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Feb 12, 2009 Pours a beautiful deep orange/amber with a thin white head. Aroma is slightly hoppy, with a malty, molassesy character to it. Tastes very well balanced, not overly hopped, very smooth. This is a great session beer for the hop lover. Extremely drinkable, a great beer for the aspiring hop head.
CaryTheDude (1114), Longmont, Colorado, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Feb 7, 2009 Crushed with Jakebra. Some nice and hops and some bad poop on the nose. Flavor is exactly the same plus some musty poop. Not exactly terrible, but not one I’d recommend. Thank God it was just in a pick six.
Diablokev (115), Lakewood, Colorado, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Feb 6, 2009 The aroma is hoppy, strong, IPAish. the appearance is a orangish amber with a thin white head leavin lace. The flavor was a bit week, somewhat missing. Overall a nice beer but lacking in the flavor dept.
SudsMcDuff (1798), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
| 4.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Jan 27, 2009 had with stumac .. amazing amazing smell, could be a 15/10 in that department .. very enjoyable brew ... some light fruits with all that floral and magic ... a new music genre: scaphorn (stumac?) ... a great great session pale , i want this in texas!
crackedmachine (89), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 24, 2009 Updated: Jan 28, 2009The flavor, for me, is off. I feel like the hops, which give a nice aroma, haven’t been well utilized. The taste just isn’t there, which counts against this one given that it’s sold as a dry-hopped ale. Something about this just doesn’t taste right - too sweet, poorly balanced.
It’s winter in the northwest - maybe I should try it again in the summer and see how I feel about it then.
Block (379), West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 |
Jan 23, 2009 Orange pour with a large orange-white head. Strong aroma of hops. Flavor of citrus and hops. Nice bitterness. Very drinkable.
DrDavid (957), Johnson, Vermont, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Jan 18, 2009 Bottle. Perfumy aroma. Hazy orange amber body, large off-white head. Flavor is surprisingly unassertive, some grapefruit and malt, that then dissipates rapidly.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)