RateBeer
BridgePort Ropewalk Amber Ale 2.9 122

BridgePort Ropewalk Amber Ale

Percentile
36
overall

bottled
available

on tap
available

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1222.9/5.02.9/5.05.6%43.1English pint, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Ropewalk is a mellow, malt-driven amber that dances a subtly sweet line. The balance of Crystal malt with a subtle dose of Northwest hops delivers a refreshing ale that makes for a great session beer. Originally brewed to mark our 20th anniversary, Ropewalk – which literally means “a long narrow building where rope is made” – is a tribute to our building’s roots as a rope factory, while also celebrating feats of daring everywhere.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 DarkElf (2681), La Jolla, California, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/56/103/513/20
Jan 7, 2005  
(12 oz bottle: BevMo in La Jolla, CA) Caramely and sugary, but somehow it doesn’t seem overly sweet. A mild "brown ale" roastiness, and general earthiness bordering on cardboard, shows up in the finish. Bitterness is very light. Sugary nose with a slight caramel aroma. Almost medium bodied, but it is a bit thin overall, and especially so in the finish. Ruddy amber color and fully clear. Off-white head fades to a thin film, but somehow leaves some patches of fairly dense lace behind. Not the greatest beer, but this is generally a boring style in my opinion, and you can do much worse than this amber.


 drismyhero (815), Tacoma, Washington, USA
2.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/55/102/511/20
Dec 17, 2004  
Looks bland somehow. I know that sounds extremely presumptious and uneducated but it really does look bland - light brown with minimal head, yielding no signs of excitement. The aroma is no different, overly smooth boring malt, perhaps a tad smokey. Flavor is a touch bitter, some smoke here too, a little cane sugar. Poor malt profile (although fairly present). Boring, just flat out boring.


 motelpogo (4394), Plzen, Czech Republic
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/103/514/20
Nov 15, 2004  
on tap and cask at bridgeport. plenty of white grape in the aroma. the cask version had quite a firm texture and some sourness which kept you wanting more. tasty stuff


Eddieboy (2), USA
does not count click to see why this rating of BridgePort Ropewalk Amber Ale does not count
4.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
10/105/59/104/518/20
Oct 7, 2004  
I loved this beer; I guess to each his own... The smell was wonderful, inviting, provacative. The deep amber color was beautiful. This is what I’ve been looking for in an amber that has a bit more punch then Fat Tire.


 IndianaRed (1560), Boise, Idaho, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/56/103/513/20
Oct 6, 2004  
Bottle Pours a deep redish brown with a nice thick beige head. Fine sheeting lacing as well. Aroma is a woody sweet malt mostly. Not much hops are evident. Flavor is straight forward and simple, sweet malts some dark roast flavors and a thin feel with lazy carbonation. Aftertaste is a wet cardboard woody flavor. Not bad.


 Hab40oz (242), Grants Pass, Oregon, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/104/513/20
Sep 16, 2004  
not a great amber ale, it does the trick if your looking for a drinkable summer ale that you care more to consume than to taste but you all can do much better with Full Sail Amber or Rogue American Amber, due try.


 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/56/103/514/20
Sep 8, 2004  
Nice amber/red color,small off white head that had a decent hangtime then faded to leave little behind.The aroma was nicely malty with a bit of caramel and some mild hop notes.The flavor was malty with a mild sweetness and a bit of light caramel coming through with the hops showing up towards the end but not overly done.This brew is a nice surprise to some amber i’ve had makeing this a brew that is well worth trying again.


 Pigfoot (2226), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/102/512/20
Sep 5, 2004  
Bright garnet hue is it’s appearance, gifted with a fine, beige head, gently fading to a small ring. Aroma, hoppy, fruity,(cherries and berries) a bit dry, eventually. Taste: yup, it has some, but rather mild, ...hops bite for a brief bit, then step back, and it’s all smooth, but also tepid. Very mellow, but also on the side of blase. Zingy taste, for a second, then the body collapses and the finish never shows. Not bad for just drinkin’...and I’ll leave it at that...



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC