RateBeer

Bud Ice Light

Percentile
0
overall

bottled
common

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
2001.11/5.01.16/5.04.1%0.6Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Introduced in 1994, Bud Ice Light has fewer calories than Bud Ice.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
jturmel12 (4), Lutz, Florida, USA
does not count click to see why this rating of Bud Ice Light does not count
2.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/55/102/58/20
Dec 4, 2003  
One of my favorite Ice beers. You get drunk after about 8 and it is pretty cheap. The only thing is a bad hangover the next day. cool bottles too.


 alcoholica (128), Dublin, Ohio, USA
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/51/101/52/20
Nov 17, 2003  
This sucks! The only reason most people drink Ice beer is because it has a high alcohol content. You take that away and now you have nothing. NO point in this beer


 wulfhere (217), Billings, Montana, USA
1.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/104/52/102/53/20
Nov 11, 2003  
Wow! This is sooo much better than Bud Ice! What the hell was I thinking! Same Shit, Diferent Bud. This thin, pale, cidery swill isn't even fit for Boiling Bratwurst.


 kumite56 (461), Cordova, Tennessee, USA
1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/101/52/102/53/20
Nov 7, 2003  
Just what you would expect. Not anything... including offensive. Could be worse but not much.


 ross (1709), weddington, South Carolina, USA
0.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/53/20
Oct 22, 2003  
hmm i dont know. this isnt very good. it was really cold after i had quite a bit and it was ok then. bud ice is better.


stemba (16), South Carolina, USA
0.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/102/52/101/53/20
Sep 5, 2003  
Bud light was bad, this is worse. Only flavor I can pick out is chemically fermented corn, which is no joy to any palate.


petefenelon (26), England
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Aug 15, 2003  
Bwhahahahahahaha. I can't imagine anyone drinking this voluntarily if there's any other beer around. Vaguely useful as cheap coolant on a very, very hot day.


 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
1.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/53/101/56/20
Aug 4, 2003  
Is this real beer,I don't know but i do know when i have a can of swill in my hand,and this is definately one of those times.other then the color being good the rest is quite bad,no head that was worth mentioning,the taste was weak and corny with the after taste being quite forgettable.definatley a brew that shouldn't be.



CONSIDER FREE RATEBEER MEMBERSHIP



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

SIGN UP NOW »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC