 thehurt01 (208), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Oct 18, 2009
12 oz botle. The beer poured a cloudy dark yellow with a fizzy head. The smell is of rice krispys soaking in old milk. The taste is an nice wheat smoothness but lacking carbonation.
maniac (2770), Richmond, Virginia, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 2, 2010 Bottle on 11/14/2009. Slightly hazy golden orange body with a small frothy white head. Sweet fruity and spicy aroma with a wheat background. Sweet fruity flavor with lemon zest, coriander, and a wheat background. Medium body with moderately high carbonation.
beerdad (90), Kansas, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jan 2, 2010 Bottled. Pours golden orange, with medium off white head. Smells of soap and earth. Flavors are lacking. i can almost pick up orange peel, but am not sure if that’s just wishful thinking because it says citrus on the label. Will not buy this again.
BobbyAnalog (31), California, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jan 1, 2010 Drinking Bud Light’s Golden Wheat is akin to be popped in the mouth with a bucket full of oranges. There is a tart zing that overwhelms the taste of the alleged wheat flavor. A fizzy beer - as to be expected - that summons up thoughts of lemon pie filling and sour Jolly Ranchers. I’m sure that, with this type of anticlimactic beer flavor, Bud Light Golden Wheat could double for a poor man’s Arnold Palmer. You’d be better off sucking up the calories of a hefeweizen if you wanted an adequate wheat beer.
fakepurseninja (797), Washington, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 31, 2009 Nice looking profile. Hazed golden straw body sporting a sizable, fluffy white head. Very watery and thin. Wheat malt is almost undetectable but as a bonus the rice is also subdued. Spice Is minimal. I was very thisty and this was more refreshing than the crappy iced tap water.
slayer02348 (61), , Michigan, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 30, 2009 Interesting beer. My friends who are not as into beer as I am describe it as ’a poor man’s blue moon’. Its really not a terrible wheat, and definitely better than bud light.
s0me0nesmind1 (6), Alabama, USA
does not count  | 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Dec 29, 2009 Pours a nice hazy golden orange with medium off-white head. Aroma consists of harsh orange peel. Flavor reveals a corriander taste with a bit of a wheat and glimpses of bud light general flavor. All in all I say impressive for a wheat beer with 102 calories.
Finhead (102), Illinois, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Dec 27, 2009 A hazy golden pour with medium golden head. It has a citrus and wheat aroma that matches the sweet taste. The body is light and lively with a thin texture and clean finish.
ebarnes (220), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 26, 2009 Not a terrible beer but not spectacular either. I could see drinking these very cold on a hot summer day and they would be refreshing.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)