Block (379), West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Oct 30, 2009 Pours a light amber with a small white head. Aroma is very similar to Bud Light with a little bit of orange. Flavor is bland. Basically citrus added to Bud Light. I didn’t enjoy this one much but some of my friends who drink Bug Light regularly really like it.
BobbyAnalog (31), California, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jan 1, 2010 Drinking Bud Light’s Golden Wheat is akin to be popped in the mouth with a bucket full of oranges. There is a tart zing that overwhelms the taste of the alleged wheat flavor. A fizzy beer - as to be expected - that summons up thoughts of lemon pie filling and sour Jolly Ranchers. I’m sure that, with this type of anticlimactic beer flavor, Bud Light Golden Wheat could double for a poor man’s Arnold Palmer. You’d be better off sucking up the calories of a hefeweizen if you wanted an adequate wheat beer. fakepurseninja (794), Washington, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Dec 31, 2009 Nice looking profile. Hazed golden straw body sporting a sizable, fluffy white head. Very watery and thin. Wheat malt is almost undetectable but as a bonus the rice is also subdued. Spice Is minimal. I was very thisty and this was more refreshing than the crappy iced tap water. slayer02348 (50), , Michigan, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Dec 30, 2009 Interesting beer. My friends who are not as into beer as I am describe it as ’a poor man’s blue moon’. Its really not a terrible wheat, and definitely better than bud light. s0me0nesmind1 (6), Alabama, USA does not count | 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Dec 29, 2009 Pours a nice hazy golden orange with medium off-white head. Aroma consists of harsh orange peel. Flavor reveals a corriander taste with a bit of a wheat and glimpses of bud light general flavor. All in all I say impressive for a wheat beer with 102 calories. Finhead (101), Illinois, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Dec 27, 2009 A hazy golden pour with medium golden head. It has a citrus and wheat aroma that matches the sweet taste. The body is light and lively with a thin texture and clean finish. ebarnes (220), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Dec 26, 2009 Not a terrible beer but not spectacular either. I could see drinking these very cold on a hot summer day and they would be refreshing. SuperDave70 (1158), Beautiful Sunny Mesa, Arizona, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Dec 22, 2009 Light, slightly sweet, a tiny bit of citrus, some wheat and yeast. Not bad, but nothing fantastic. TheBeerOrg (1589), Kentucky, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Dec 22, 2009 Pours light golden and slightly hazy with a fully receding off-white head. Notes of light malt, wheat, citrus, co2. Thin bodied with moderate fizzy carbonation.
|