RateBeer
Bud Light Golden Wheat 2.28 192

Bud Light Golden Wheat

Percentile
9
overall

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1922.26/5.02.28/5.04.1%5.9Shaker, Weizen
Commercial Description:
A light beer brewed with coriander and citrus peels
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 ben4321 (1041), Rockville, Maryland, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/52/101/55/20

Nov 6, 2009  
Location: A few sips from a 12 oz bottle someone brought to a party, 10/31/09

Overall Impression: Lets just say those few sips were enough for me...
The scores seem high to me, this crap tasted like Bud Light, except hazier. I mean, I’m scoring this one for it really is, a weak offering.


 riversideAK (2766), Shoreline, Washington, USA
2.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/103/512/20
Dec 21, 2009  
On tap at Qwest. Consumed while the Seahawks shit the bed playing the Bucs. Nose of faint wheat, orange, and corriander. Also hints of Bud Light. Pours hazy yellow with a short lived fizzy head. The flavor is light and somewhat unobtrusive with notes of corriander and orange, light wheat, and a little Bud Light taste. Super light. Not as bad as I thought it would be, seriously a decent AB product that I will drink again next Hawks shit fest.


 Ughsmash (4060), Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/53/102/58/20
Dec 20, 2009  
Bottled.. and what a beer for the nightcap! Poured clear, medium orange with a tight-bubbled, well-calculated cap of white head. The aroma picked up orange peel and vanilla over a weak pale malty base.. non-offensive. The flavor found about the same stuff.. dry, scratchy pale malts and assertive carbonation at the core with tart orange peel and wheaty notes around.. short finish picked up a little honey. Light-bodied and watery at times on the palate.. sharp at times.. about what I expected


 SamGamgee (1464), Santa Cruz (La Selva), California, USA
2.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/54/103/59/20
Dec 20, 2009  
Draught at Old Juan’s in Oceano. The best draught option, over bud light and coors light. That’s just sad. Well, it was a new beer that pormised to at least be a little interesting. Big light meets witbier? I guess that’s what they were going for, but the bud light part wins out in the end. Dull hazy gold in color with a quickly dying white head. The aroma shows the advertised orange peel, along with some sweet grain, and an impossibly small hint of spice. The flavor has a little orange and wheat before a short and watery finish devoid of any beer character. Lightly sweet, no bitterness, and a mostly clean profile that tastes more like a lager. Light bodied and a little spritzy. Better than regular bud light, and has much more flavor overall, though I don’t know If I could take more than a couple of these, which I can always to with the regular stuff due to its clean, watery nature.


 TomDecapolis (3197), Skippack, Pennsylvania, USA
2.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/55/103/58/20
Dec 19, 2009  
Pours a very lightly hazy golden orange with a small bubbly white head. Aroma of orange and light corriander. Flavor also has the light orange and corriander notes. The orange is a little soda like. The beer has some light cereal grains/wheat present...really not a horrible beer, but also not good. Would pick over Bud Light...but thats about it.


 Maddog (248), Kettering, Ohio, USA
2.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/102/55/102/58/20
Dec 18, 2009  
Damn, I just rated a Bud Light product over "2!" I have wanted to try this beer for quite awhile. I did not have high expectations, but surprisingly for the Evil Empire Brewing Co. this wheat actually tastes like a wheat, albeit a very, very light and thin one. The pour is cloudy but lacks any head to speak of. The aroma is faint traces of wheat, yeast and fruit. Flavors of citrus and coriander and yeast exist, but there’s just not enough. For God’s sake, don’t be afraid to be good. Why does this brewery continue to brew microbrewed styles of beer for the Bud Light guys who don’t really like beer in the first place?


 Homebrewerguy (285), Oil City, Pennsylvania, USA
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/105/55/103/512/20
Dec 17, 2009  
I don’t understand all the ratings calling this beer horrible. Compared to Bud light, this is a major step forward. It IS a light beer and should be rated as such. I’ve had this beer on draft and in bottle and prefer the draft. It poured slightly darker than Bud Light with a decent off-white head. Flavor was mostly orange and coriander with some wheat in the background. Not overly carbonated makes this an easy beer to drink. At $23.00 a case, A-B will sell a lot of this.


 boFNjackson (1318), Portland, Oregon, USA
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/54/102/58/20
Dec 13, 2009  
Bottle (thanks to Angeloregon for sharing)... Poured orange with no head. A very bland, malted, sweet, almost factory made aroma -- one that would match other Bud aromas. Sweet, easy drinking beer, with that hint of orange peel and coriander spiced before a malted wheat finish.


 Jblauvs (600), Manchester, New Hampshire, USA
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/55/20
Dec 13, 2009  
Draft for cheap. Golden pour with an offwhite head. Aroma is Budlight with some cardboardy wheatiness. Flavor is pretty bland with some wheat and a very subdued citrus. Even for 2$ its a stretch.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC