mattmc1973 (305), Sterling Heights, Michigan, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | May 31, 2009 Went to a party, and this crap was all they had. No aroma or taste. I heard it’s distilled urine...true story. Quenching in the same way cold water is. Blech. troopie (870), USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | May 31, 2009 Tin. It was all Burt had. Poured pale urine gold with no head. No aroma. No flavour, no finish. It was like water, but not as refreshing. ZR2Blazer (46), Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 29, 2009 Updated: May 31, 2009Can - Pours very pale golden with nose of yeast. Taste is very light, bland and has a slight carbonated finish. For what it is, it gets the job done. This is my go-to when I want a light US domestic.
Lets be honest, if you’re going tubing, or to the pool or the beach you’re not going to bring anything high end with you. That’s when Bud Light comes in handy. If it’s hot out, this beer can be refreshing. I don’t think a serious beer drinker is going to sit around their house drinking this, but I think it has it’s place and deserves a little more credit than it’s getting on here. LaMichael (4999), Colorado, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | May 28, 2009 Draft @ Coors Field. Pale yellow, clear. No nose. Little to no flavor. Crisp, refreshing and sharp. There’s a reason millions of people drink this: serve it ice cold and there’s little to no taste at all and the fizzy carbonation and crispness is really quite refreshing. There’s also a reason people don’t drink the last bit - when it warms it’s actually quite disgusting. You rate cask ale how it’s supposed to be served, cellar temp, not ice cold. So you should rate Bud Light how it’s supposed to be served, ice cold, not warm. It’s not a *bad* beer, it’s *neutral*. That said, I’m just kind of bored today so thought I’d actually put in a review for this gem... and I’ve had a lot of craft beer recently worse than this - honest. ilherps (226), Carbondale, Illinois, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | May 28, 2009 Light, straw yellow and fizzy. Tastes strongly malty with little else. Typical american lager Rciesla (3610), Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 5/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | May 25, 2009 Can, bottle, and draft. Dam you AB for making this beer, i have played so much dam beer pong because of these crappy light lagers, wait actually that’s not a bad thing is it. Well its a light golden body that is essentially tasteless at proper serving temp and has some light grain and corn husk as it warms, but hey i’d still rather have the full strength as your obviously not drinking this one for the taste. markwise (1178), 15 Minutes from Kuhnhenn in, Florida, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | May 25, 2009 I won’t even bother adjusting the score. All adjuncts and very little quality ingredients except maybe the quality water used. More like the jester of beers, than the king. WVHouseofBeer (370), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | May 22, 2009 This is a terrible beer, but definitely not the worst. If you’re going to buy this then you might as well buy Natural Light to save some money.
|