xShanex (47), Mansfield, Texas, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Mar 30, 2008 Golden water with C02 shot into it. Almost tastless. Its a shame to see so many fall to its successful marketing. Cheap way to get drunk. nate2g (1079), Brisbane, Australia
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 29, 2008 I really don’t know how this can be consumed by the majority. Fantastic marketing, I’ll give them that. Skunky, thin, watery, tasteless. I’ve said enough. halfonit (452), Fall River, Massachusetts, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Mar 29, 2008 Updated: Sep 26, 2009This is the beer everybody knows. It taste like beer I think. So much carbonation in it that I feel like burping after every sip. If it wasn’t so affordable, I’d probably hardly drink it. But I’m a man on a budget for now. scooterbub (355), Lander, Wyoming, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Mar 28, 2008 40 ounce bottle. Pours a light yellow with a decent white head that fades away. Aroma and Taste are very clean. What can be picked up is of corn. On the watery side. Overall, it is not bad as it goes down smooth, finishes clean and is rather refreshing at times. However, for the price it is not worth it. Regular Bud is much better and there are tastier beers out there for the same price or cheaper. WesKBob (321), Bethany, Oklahoma, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Mar 28, 2008 Just my opinion, but rating this beer relative to a good Belgian or imperial stout isn’t really a fair comparison. We should be rating this beer relative to what the brewers were trying to do and their competition. In that regard, Bud Light shapes up fairly well compared to the Miller Lite (no flavor) and Coors Lights (bad flavor) of the world. Pours a clear yellow color with little head. Little aroma, and a weak grainy flavor. Not a great beer by any means, but I think a lot of the raters on here are using an unfair measuring stick when judging this one. BeerFanDan17 (616), Land O Lakes, Florida, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 27, 2008 Basically one of the worst beers available. It is watery, flavorless, and cheap. Pours light golden with a frothy head. Tastes like liquid chex mix. wacohoover (100), Garland, Texas, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 27, 2008 Bad - beer? - Period. I want to use this in my toilet. How people love this stuff I do not know. No flavor to speak of, no head, no class, no, no, no. I give it a 2 overall b/c I feel it’s only slightly better than Olympia! loveamberbock (8), Jefferson City, Missouri, USA does not count | 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 26, 2008 I know this is the staple for college beer. pfff! i will never go back to drinking this. it makes me want to puke. no flavor. flat head. no smell except of.....?
|