baileyuk (11), Wixom, Michigan, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | May 4, 2008 How could I ever have drank this? The taste is more like slightly strange tasting water. The ultimate test was complete when that was my only option at a hotel I was at. I tried to shandy it to give it something but to no avail. I settled for a diet coke!
With the big beer makers push to try and convince people that they actually use hops I tried hard for any incling of a hop taste. That got me focusing on the tastee so things went down hill. Hopefully the big players do not use the hop shortage to try and dent the inroads craft brewing has made to the masses.
junon (226), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Dec 31, 2009 You know what? This is not nearly as bad as I remember. Much more everything that I remember from colour, body, and flavour. I wouldnt go as far as to say its "good" but maybe "not bad". Problem being both nose and flavour are fleeting. Its crisp of course. I cant say that Im hating this at all. NOTE: its 3:41am and Ive put down 1 bottle of chardonnay and 1 bomber of Rogue Northwestern Ale prior to this rating. This was a last resort to keep it going. Maverick34 (729), New York, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Dec 28, 2009 if only this guy were triple hops brewed, I’m sure that’s where they fell off the wagon. duffmanyeah (12), Escondido, California, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 5/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 | Dec 27, 2009 The differance is drinkablility! Unlike those other Ales you can suck this back and it is so refreshing. I think bud hit one out with this creation! Croff (9), Trelleborg, Sweden does not count | 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Dec 27, 2009 This is pretty much like the regular Bud, only watered down. But that a good thing, less nasty taste. Quick leaving head. Bad aftertaste. No body at all. arminjewell (215), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Dec 25, 2009 Pours golden with little to no head, taste is completely corn. No thanks! jimmay (231), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Dec 25, 2009 355 ml can from TBS. This is bad macro. No hops, no malt, all corn. Would not buy this. cbkschubert (2027), Cochise Co., Arizona, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 15/20 | Dec 13, 2009 12 oz. can from 7-11 and poured into my brandy snifter - Ahhh, Bud Light, an American classic [said with tongue and cheek]. This beer came out while I was in High School. So, unfortunately, I drank more than my fair share of this stuff while growing up in S. AZ and my early days in the Navy. Next to Miller Lite, I’ve probably drank this beer more than any other. Looking back, I’m not too proud of the fact. However, I’ve had many a good time with a BL in my hand. I’m not going to bore anyone with my description of the beer. It’s been bashed enough. Do I like BL? NO Will I drink it again? YES badlizard (2395), Berkeley, California, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 8, 2009 The alcohol content is the only redeeming aspect of this brew. Pale yellow with a fizzy white head. Not much to speak of in terms of taste or aroma or palate; they’re all so close to water that it’s difficult to differentiate from H2O. Reminds me of that English joke, "how is American beer like having sex in a canoe? They’re both fucking close to water."
|