tgncc (820), Bellmore, New York, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jul 17, 2008 The aroma is mostly of corn and other adjuncts, same as regular bud. Maybe slightly less offensive. Boring appearance of yellow, with a white head, true to the style. The flavor is of corn, malts, other adjuncts. No hops flavor, or hoppiness in the finish. Great if you want to get sh1tfaced on a budget. cdub939 (18), Florida, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jul 16, 2008 Clean Taste that is easy to drink.
Sits decent in Stomache
Have had better tasting beers
But this one is good if your friend has some in the fridge brewcrew2002 (50), USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 15, 2008 not bad for the type of beer, cheap and watery, pours a golden yellow with no aroma. ucusty (1893), Wake Forest, North Carolina, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Jul 12, 2008 Pale gold pour. Watery, light and crisp. The only reason i tried it was it was left in the condo (amongst other crap a/b products) by my wife’s aunt. It was good beach swill and it doesn’t matter when the kids knock one over... iride15 (171), Orlando, Florida, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 12, 2008 Going back to college days, this was the better beer we had at some of the parties (for select guests and hosts). Still cheap enough to make it worth buying for a contrast to the crappy kegs for the masses. Still a macro lager that’s American, and most of them are all the same. Simple flavor and aroma, taste a little above the rest of the American lagers. GMUcrew7 (360), Mason, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jul 5, 2008 After a while it gets tiring rating all the horrible beers from my early drinking years. Another skunky smelling beer with few redeeming qualities other than its sharp looking black and red can. It’s better than bud light, and it has more alcohol and fewer calories so for a cheap bbq beer its not too terrible. Block (369), West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Jul 5, 2008 Tastes like every other macro lager. I’m not sure what makes this select, besides maybe it wasn’t tossed around baked in the sun after it was bottled. To advertise that it’s low in calories and carbohydrates proves that the flavor is a direct product of the cheap/ minimal ingredients.
Don’t get me wrong, I love low calorie items, but it’s not why I drink beer. JonR888710 (999), Cochabamba, Bolivia
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jul 3, 2008 Very clear gold with a fizzy white head. Aroma is very light, almost non existant. Flavor is similar with trace rice, corn, barley and drying hops. So faint, this is like seltzer water with barley. Drank six 16 oz. aluminum bottles of this at the Hard Rock Casino Pool in Las Vegas, NV.
|