BruceLeroy (77), North Dakota, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 20, 2008 Seems to be more carbonated that regular Budweiser. The aroma is putrid. Bad actually. But the taste is better. Aside from the carbonation it seems very close to Bud Light. It does not have so much of the rice ethanol taste of regular Budweiser. Overall not very good, but okay if you want to get wasted for cheap and it’s on sale.
 msante79 (827), Orland Hills, Illinois, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Apr 18, 2008 I remember when it came out and they thought it was the shit. It is funny how you go to a bar and they have 15 taps and they are all AB and Miller products and they pretty much taste the same.
steazyb23 (13), California, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Apr 18, 2008 very light yellow body is very clean clear with lively carbonation very thick head not my favorite i would choose bud light over it
rampmaster (322), Alden, New York, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 4/5 | 5/20 |
Apr 15, 2008 There is not much to say or taste here. It pours very light yellow. The body is very clean and clear with lively carbonation that forms a thick white head. The aroma is light, mostly of rice and hay. There is not a bit of hops anywhere. The flavor is also very light. Mostly of rice, paper and hay, that leads you to a crisp clean finish. Overall its low carbohydrate, low calories and low on flavor.
hero12 (61), USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Apr 14, 2008 Updated: Apr 15, 2008I have to say it is better than bud light, but still nothing to brag about. It is decent for the price though.
scooterbub (379), Lander, Wyoming, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 13, 2008 Bottle. Pours a light golden yellow with a large, white and active head that fades to a thin sized head. Aroma and Taste are very faithful to the normal Budweiser. Some would say this is a bad thing, but for being a lighter version of Budweiser, I say it is a wonderful thing. Better than Bud Light and is crisp, clean, smooth, refreshing and inexpensive. Overall, not bad.
thechandler (270), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 13, 2008 Pours a pale golden. Just about what you’d expect. Aroma exists, which is a bit surprising. A little sweet, a little yeasty. Flavor is much the same. Not a whole lot there, honestly...but whats there is surprisingly crisp, mellow and...god forbid, almost decent. Certainly thinner than what I’m used to, but its smooth and doesn’t have the taste of animal urine, which is surprising for an AB product. I wouldn’t drink it again, but it was much better than I expected.
Only after I finished this brew did I look at the born-on date to realize this beer was 3 years. old. My suggestion: Cellar this one. lol
Apache (18), Georgia, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Apr 12, 2008 Very little taste, drinks smooth, almost like a soft drink. It’s drinkable, but not much else can be said that’s good about it.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)