Bonster (113), Jersey Shore, New Jersey, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Oct 2, 2009 I don’t think I can add anything enlightening about this beer. Not the worst I’ve ever had but it’s far from good. iabeerguy (175), Iowa, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Sep 28, 2009 Not much going on with this beer. Pale yellow color, not much head and the same light beer taste, hop water. Still shocks me how many people say these types of beers are their "favorite". CitizenZ (23), Kansas, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Sep 19, 2009 For only 99 calories, a good alcoholic drink. As a beer, its a lousy draft. Light amber pour, minimal head dissolves very quickly leaving no lacing. Watery, second press malt flavor, no follow through, no complexity, its pretty much just carbonation and malt. My preferred "light" beer (less than 112 calories), not a "good" beer by any means. kaladims (13), Texas, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 1/20 | Sep 16, 2009 this beer is good for a cheap night out never going to drink more then one Fratto (763), Arlington, Texas, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Sep 13, 2009 This is the very best of the bad, cheap lagers. If I can only afford a Bud, it’s a Bud Select. drowland (1433), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Aug 24, 2009 Why does this even exist? To kill Miller Lite? Nice try, A-B. Another cruddy beer from a cruddy company. CUJO (379), Brooklyn, New York, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Aug 18, 2009 I don’t want to comment on this. Do I have to? Bud + .036549 rounded. At least there is some more taste to this, even though its not good!
|