184601 (144), Mexicali, Mexico
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Jan 11, 2008 Basically the Budweiser formula, but wth less salt, carbonation.Great , worth to try.It has a great aroma too, pale yellow body, outstanding extra-white head, salty, palate, but it quite doesnt leave a bad aftertaste. docsteigs (139), USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jan 6, 2008 Drank out of the bottle so didnt get a good look at it. Tastes more or less like regular Bud. Not sure what is "select" about it. Drink it cold and for what it is. Rice beer soda. Nothing offensive about it so I wont go below 2.5. amishcaravan (237), Winona, Minnesota, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 4, 2008 Just got done drinking some real beer. Decided to try this and see what happened. As expected, it tastes like cold water compared to what I’ve had in the past. I think if I were homeless, I would probably dump these bottles out and use them as a toilet so they would be put to better use. merlin48 (511), New Tazewell, Tennessee, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 2, 2008 12 oz bottle pours a very pale yellow body with a tiny white head that quickly disappears without lacing. Essentially no aroma here, but corn adjuncts are noted as it warms. Crisp carbonation tries to enliven the light body. Taste is weak, akin to tonic water. Maybe some light grain noted. Creamed corn notes appear as it warms. Very disappointing. Haslinger (647), Syracuse, New York, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 29, 2007 Not very discernable from regular Bud, not anything special at all. Just Bud trying to dress up a bad beer IlanMan (817), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Dec 29, 2007 Updated: Jan 18, 2008Basically the same as bud light. This just has slightly (as in unnoticable) more hops and flavor. Definitely a redneck’s way of drinking classy. thekmoonlegend (93), Lynn, Massachusetts, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Dec 26, 2007 This beer is much better than Bud Light. Although still lacking much taste when compared to similar pale lagers (ex: Rolling Rock), it’s not the worst. And even though I never really care about the calories when I have a brew, at least you can feel kind of good about drinking a beer with only 99 calories. I’d take it on a hot summer day or with food. Angeloregon (2025), Portland, Oregon, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Dec 24, 2007 On tap at some dive bar in Ft. Myers, Florida-Thin, watery, flavorless beer with no hop presence and hardly a malt bill. Refreshing in hot Florida sun. Too bad I was in air conditioned bar.
|