hammerbeck (101), Kentucky, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 | Aug 31, 2007 Better than regular Bud is the best thing I can say about this stuff, but that’s like saying getting kicked in the nuts by Scarlett Johanssen is better than getting kicked in the nuts by anybody else. You’re still rolling around on the ground, cradling your junk, and crying. hombrepalo (779), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Aug 29, 2007 Keep going! Budwweiser’s attempt to make a better, almost decent beer. They still need to keep working on it! almost half way there. ShamRock (20), Rochester, New York, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Aug 25, 2007 I don’t hate drinking this. It is better then regular bud. Well balanced and smooth. Has a slightly bitter taste. It is low in calories so its almost a health drink...right. rugbydude05 (300), Kew Gardens, New York, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | Aug 24, 2007 Almost identical to regular Budweiser- lack of aroma, taste, and body but slightly more smooth than the regular variety. shotgun1431 (92), franklin furnace, Ohio, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Aug 19, 2007 Budweiser at its finest. Crisp and refreshing on a summers day. Very easy drinking. The flavor is alcohol and and a few hops. An OK beer. Pwn3d (1087), Manhattan, New York, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Aug 15, 2007 Updated: Jan 6, 2008i really enjoy this beer, pretty much the same flavor with less carbs. its cheap too. dkherigon (25), Great Falls, Montana, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Aug 14, 2007 Bottle at a Poker game. I was all about this beer 2 years ago. My palate must have changed. I like the crisp light flavor, which has more flavor then the other light beers I have drank. It is a better beer for the mass produced, but not worth the price. If it is free, and you have a choice among the other mass beers..... MadMan (497), Tempe, Arizona, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Aug 14, 2007 Draft and Bottle at Sea World. When questioning the AB reps about their goal they admitted they were trying hard to make a low calorie beer that still had some flavor and this was an attempt to combat Miller Lite. Well, they failed at the flavor part but apparently did pretty well on the low calorie part. It is typically flavorless but has a nice crisp clean finish and drinks as easily as water. I expect it will do well with the non beer loving beer drinkers just as most pale lagers do. It is not for me though......i’ll take the calories as punishment for good taste.
|