ronaldtheriot (64), Laplace, Louisiana, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Jun 15, 2009 If one must have a light beer, then this is one of the less horrible ones. A little richer taste than Bud Light. It’s the one to grab if only light beers are offered.
RJT
bluecollarboy (36), Illinois, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Jun 13, 2009 Aroma is of wet hay and sweet corn; brew has a pale golden appearance. Pours a thin head that diminishes quickly. Tastes like watered down Bud LIght. Slight bitter up front, finishes crisp and clean. Light everything: body, texture, and carbonation. Overall, very drinkable for a light beer. Flavor is a little on the short side, but if you are on a diet and restricting calories/carbs, this beer may be a good choice.
 TheOrange (419), Kent, Ohio, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jun 13, 2009 The pour is a pale golden yellow, with a large sudsy white head. The aroma is mild, a touch of hop, other than that not much. The beer is thin, the hops are very mild, the malts are not noticeable. Highly carbonated. The taste lingers on the the tounge. Not a very good beer.
OzarkElmo (134), Poplar Bluff, Missouri, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jun 9, 2009 From can to shaker June 7, 2009. Boy this beer is all marketing - I have never liked it. I guess a slight more taste than Bud Light, but not very good. Light corn/hay/ grainy taste with little head that dissipates and no lacing remaining. Give me a Miller Lite please! Would never spend money on this beer.
RHeastings (429), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 |
Jun 6, 2009 Served via draft and ingested from a tall hefeweizen glass. I obviously wasn’t expecting much from this, but it was all they had at the restaurant I was at. The most noticeable aroma was one of carbonation, it you can even call that an aroma. Malt and hops were essentially undetectable. Perhaps a little bit of rice and a touch of corn came through in the palate, if anything. Overall, just like Budweiser and the rest of this conglomerate’s offerings, it was a joke.
adavis234 (137), Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
May 28, 2009 Not sure if it is possible to pack less taste into a beer than this one. Tastes like drinking from a dirty water fountain.
ilherps (233), Carbondale, Illinois, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
May 28, 2009 A nice featherweight alternative to bud. If youre worried about calories this one is where to go, skip bud light.
markwise (1200), 15 Minutes from Kuhnhenn in, Florida, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
May 25, 2009 It really is better than Bud/ Bud Light. It is still 99% adjuncts, but has an ounce of malt and a few hops. Lots of carbonation and bland corn with plenty of water.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)