 Jayson2425 (167), Box Elder, South Dakota, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
May 25, 2009
One of the best low calorie beers i have had. ok tasting for a american lager but would rather have the big brother budweiser
kwerikson (101), burlington, New Jersey, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Nov 27, 2009 had a little while ago. disgusting for me, but maybe not ot others. the flavors did not intermingle well. one thing overpowered another. aftertaste was groteque and unsatisfying. will not drink again and can not pair with any food what so ever. dont torture tourself by trying this.
Prometheus (97), Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 26, 2009 Better than Bud Light.
Light yellow color, no head.
Would drink over Bud Lgith any day, I suppose?
1010 (208), Marysville, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Oct 19, 2009 Taste just like Bud/Bud Light and any other macro beer. Would never pay money for this one.
beercamel (84), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Oct 15, 2009 I really dont know what the select means a joke I guess, because if this is the beer you selected the laughs on you brother.
Bonster (100), Jersey Shore, New Jersey, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Oct 2, 2009 I don’t think I can add anything enlightening about this beer. Not the worst I’ve ever had but it’s far from good.
iabeerguy (164), Iowa, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Sep 28, 2009 Not much going on with this beer. Pale yellow color, not much head and the same light beer taste, hop water. Still shocks me how many people say these types of beers are their "favorite".
CitizenZ (22), Kansas, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Sep 19, 2009 For only 99 calories, a good alcoholic drink. As a beer, its a lousy draft. Light amber pour, minimal head dissolves very quickly leaving no lacing. Watery, second press malt flavor, no follow through, no complexity, its pretty much just carbonation and malt. My preferred "light" beer (less than 112 calories), not a "good" beer by any means.
kaladims (13), Texas, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 1/20 |
Sep 16, 2009 this beer is good for a cheap night out never going to drink more then one
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)