 GMUcrew7 (171), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Jul 5, 2008
After a while it gets tiring rating all the horrible beers from my early drinking years. Another skunky smelling beer with few redeeming qualities other than its sharp looking black and red can. It’s better than bud light, and it has more alcohol and fewer calories so for a cheap bbq beer its not too terrible.
PolakPorter (50), , Illinois, USA
Aug 19, 2008 I just don’t get it. Anybody who actually spends their money on this has lost their ability to taste.
kp (6200), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
Aug 18, 2008 Date: 08/03/2008
Mode: Draft
Source: Summits - Woodstock
Appearance: clear pale yellow, fine white head, thick lace patterns,
Aroma: light malt aroma with a hint a floral hops,
Flavor: light malt flavor, touch of sweet cereal, light floral hops,
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 5/20
Rating: 1.7/5.0
Drinkability: 5/10
Score: */4
Russo (478), Campinas, Brazil
Aug 13, 2008 bottled@hill tavern. Normal poor lager. Weak malt aroma, Clear pale yellow, flavor is refreshing nothing else.
BlackDonald (1040), North Carolina, USA
Aug 7, 2008 If I had to drink an AB product this would be it, this is the smoothest and cleanest of the big three in their lineup. Just slightly smoother and maltier than Bud and Bud light.
mattduling (64), Fairmont, West Virginia, USA
Aug 6, 2008 Who is Bud kidding, we all know that this is just Bud Light in a jazzed up bottle.
|
