mhoster56 (34), Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 21, 2006 The worst beer I have ever tried. Light gold in color with a putrid, cheap smell. Perhaps a hint of corn. No bite whatsoever. Whoever chooses to consume this over Schlitz or PBR is a Communist. You would be better served urinating in a Britta and drinking the results. Birdiebeagle (815), Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Mar 14, 2006 Draft, can My college beer of choice.
Not because it was good but it was cheap. Pours a light gold with a white fizzy head. Smells of corn and sweet malts. Taste is like flavored water. verge (32), USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Mar 7, 2006 Uff dah. This stuff is bad. Everytime I drink this I spend the rest of the next morning near a toilet. fordest (1954), Santee/San Diego, California, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Mar 6, 2006 So I go to this bar, and this guy I am with starts telling the girls at the bar that I am some kind of beer expert (ok, whatever! His words not mine!) So of course they look down to see what I was drinking. I quickly had to decide whether or not to explain that all the beers in the place actually tasted the same, or tell them that it was the only one I hadn’t rated, or to tell them that they were missing out on one of the beer worlds best kept secrets. I chose the last. hehehehe
HogTownHarry (4026), Toronto (Harbourfront), Ontario, Canada
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Feb 26, 2006 Can (355ml). Gotta love the NASCAR logo on this puppy - yee haw! Poured weak pee yellow, slightly bubbly, small fizzy white head. Sugary aroma of burnt muddy grain and cheap chocolate syrup - not horrible but unpleasant. Taste is corny and good grief I think those are actual hops - stale, weak, but there - it’s thin, it’s slightly vegetal, it’s too sweet - but I was surprised how little I hated it. If I had to choose between this and taking a hammer to my own hand, I’d definitely choose this beer. Bigjohnla (4), Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA does not count | 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 5/5 | 3/20 | Feb 25, 2006 My favorite fish camp project beer. You just blew $400 on lumber to build a new pier. The wife is bitching about the dishwasher and the stove on the fritz. What’s a guy to do ? You got to have plenty of beer for a project like that. it has a flavor, goes down smothly and refreshes . At $5.41 a 12 pack the price is right. The flavor is decnt and it doesnb’t kick back. It is easily the best of the low class mullet cut swills available in my areaa. vomit (65), USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Feb 16, 2006 Not bad, not great. Typical swill from Anheuser-Busch. Drinkable, but will leave no lasting memories.
Not a bad beer to have around the house, when the in-laws stop by.
It is a step better than Butt-Wiper; yet leaves one feeling that you should stick with a winner: Blatz. yarry (370), Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Feb 10, 2006 Bottle, 341 ml, 4.7% a/v
Pours a very light gold color with a fair white head. Typical pale lager fare. Smells of corn and sweet malt. Tastes like corn as well, and an aftertaste thats sweet but doesnt seem malty.
Great beer to get wrecked on. Just dont buy it to impress.
|