 ericnixon (719), Northampton, Massachusetts, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Nov 22, 2004 Volgon’s 2000th celebratory beer and he was kind enough to share with me and DirtyMike. Actually I don’t blame him for wanting to share since if it were me, I’d have dumped it down the drain. Nice head over a slightly coppery piss-yellow color (a little darker than I had expected. Smells like flat, damaged rice. Tastes like a fizzy nothingness.
JohnnyOS (646), Golden, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 2, 2006 Pours a golden yellow color with aroma of corn and some hops. Flavor is more or less carbonated water with some hops present.
Worst of the top three N/As in my opinion.
OD40oz (602), Box Elder, South Dakota, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 12, 2004 I had a sip of this at a bar just so I could rate it. You gotta love it when the white trash beers have non alcoholic brews. Its about like a yeast infected whore with a breath mint.
incutrav (576), Woodbury, Minnesota, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Nov 19, 2007 Why am i rating this and why did i drink it? well having a pregnant wife, this somehow found its way to my fridge, and im still not sure why i decided to drink one. Not sure how to review it since it tastes like tap water with a little hint of iron. some ratings might be a bit harsh, cause i didnt think it was really terrible, just tasted like nothing. absolutley no flavor. So tasted exactly like Miller Lite. actually, i think i would drink this over Miller or Bud Lite.
obisbeer (558), Barcelona, Spain
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Dec 1, 2004 Clear piss yellow with thick foamy head. Light body with adjuct ladden water flavor. Corny nose and palate. One sip and thru...too much of nothing other than bad taste!
beerhugger (541), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Nov 10, 2004 Sweet review Barry - I’m proud to be one of the damn Canucks you came to steal Bucks from. Watching you funnel that splendid American brew was a highlight for us all. If only I had the sense to add the Jim Beam to mine....as it was however I enjoyed a totally see-through, pretty much odourless, pretty much flavourless "beer" that somehow was drinkable - and in fact was almost preferable to one of the beers with alcohol we tried. I’m never going to have it again mind you, but the funnel for #2000 was perfect.
DerBiermeister (522), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 30, 2004 This tastes like...a light non-alcoholic brew. It is not...bad per se, yet it very professionally maneuvers away from being ’good’. It doesn’t have much ’taste’, or a ’palate’ to describe, but it is somehow less offensive than the regular, foul Busch. So, if I were going for something boring and dull and without alcohol, well, I think on second thought I’d just choose tea or something...
dp (512), uniontown, Ohio, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 20, 2004 Not as bad as Sharps or O’Douls. Not much taste, didn’t expect much, had it ice cold in iced mug. Did not have as much of the non-alcohol zing taste as the others
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)