 OldGrowth (1426), North Carolina, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 20, 2005 Bottle, I think someone left this here at somepoint. So so nose, sweet and sour. Green apple, sourdough, lemon/lime. Orangy gold color, Good head that disappeared quickly. Sweet bitter flavors, doughy, biscuity, lime, Thin bodied, slippery creamy mouthfeel, bitter toasted finish. A lawnmower for sure, little on the sweet side for my preference.
kujo9 (1077), North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 5/5 | 7/20 |
Feb 10, 2005 12 oz bottle for 3.99/sixer mix pack: lightly hazy light amber w/ a short lived spare white head. Aroma initially is a very strong grainy malt. Moderate DMS with hints of green apple. Not unexpected, but DMS seems a little strong. Very, very, minimal floral hop aroma; no fruitiness. Well balanced flavor, but on the sweet malty side. Grainy malt, light floral hop flavor after the initial sweetness. Light green apple, and clean otherwise. Finish is semi dry w/ a clean, malt flavored aftertaste. Heavier light body, higher medium carbonation, smooth. Not terribly exciting, but I could find a worse beer for more money!
jon112981 (327), Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Jan 26, 2005 Draft: A sweet lager with a dark yellowish color. Doesn’t look like anything really special. Doesn’t really taste like anything special either. It’s not bad, just not great.
PhatB420 (130), Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jan 8, 2005 there is nothing great about this beer, quite plain, unflavorful, disappointing, what a let down. id rather be drinking a keystone, wow, did i say that??? bad beer
WISEGUY572 (1246), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Dec 17, 2004 OK, I just can’t get excited about this. It is an average-looking, average-tasting thin little lager. Well made, I guess. Enough bitterness, I guess. Not much malt, not much mouthfeel other than an inital astringency, not much complexity or finish. I can drink this. But since it’s not low cal I wouldn/t bother with another one.
GonZoBeeR (2161), ste-Eulalie, Quebec, Canada
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Dec 3, 2004 Nez:odeur des lager d’europe malte et un autre odeur que je ne saurais dire.Au gout la meme chose une petit gout chimique.Pas tres fort comme biere.
YogiBeera (2437), Hamburg, Germany
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Nov 21, 2004 Puiiiih - what a terrible honker. Nearly straw yellow, no head, no nose at all. Sulphury stale hops taste. YUCK
SpringsLicker (2043), Tennessee, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Nov 7, 2004 Deep golden clear body that supports a sticky dense head that has a light dusting of tan to it’s color.
Aroma of malt and fresh bread dough.
The flavor is sweet ending with a bit of dryness. This has just a little more hops to it than the usual Dort/Helles but very drinkable just the same.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)