RateBeer
Buzzards Bay West Porter 3.16 24

Buzzards Bay West Porter

 (RETIRED)
Percentile
58
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
243.19/5.03.16/5.05.2%29.2English pint, Stem glass
Commercial Description:
This is a beer with a very full body; rich, deep, balanced malt flavor; and a smooth, roasted flavor with lots of chocolate and coffee-like flavors. The hops used are U.S. Magnum and English East Kent Goldings to provide a nicely balanced finish to the beer. The Porter is delicious and satisfying and makes a perfect accompaniment to vanilla or chocolate flavored desserts, and as a cold weather sipping beer. It is exceptionally drinkable for a dark, heavy beer.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 argo0 (7006), Washington DC, USA
2.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/54/102/59/20
May 13, 2002  
Nice roasty aroma. The flavor shares the roastiness, but it still comes across as watery.


 Cletus (5059), Connecticut, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/56/103/512/20
Aug 16, 2005  
From notes taken back in December: Pours deep brown with a tan head. Smells of coffee, chocolate, truffles and pepper. Tastes chocolatey with a nice full finish. Not a bad take on the style.


 JPDIPSO (4935), Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/57/103/513/20
Aug 16, 2002  
Dark clear chestnut with a light tan head. Toasty, malty and light toffee aromas. Flavors dominated by darker malts with a definate balck malt acidic finish


 muzzlehatch (4427), Burlington, Vermont, USA
2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/104/53/102/57/20
Jan 23, 2004  
12 oz bottle. Almost black, darkly translucent, medium lasting tan head. Light sweetish nose, bit of roastiness, also a bit of soap. Had that in another BB beer recently; coincidence? Alas, detergent qualities show up in the flavor, which is overall sweet, slight roasted graininess, some decent character towards the end, but quite mediocre on all counts. Overall, this beer, and brewery, have no reason to exist that I can discern.


 ClarkVV (3578), Allston, Massachusetts, USA
3.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/58/104/516/20
Sep 23, 2004  
2004 bottle. I knew my faith in this brewery was well-placed. Pours an ultra dark-brown, seemingly opaque though perhas just very dark, as I dont believe it is bottle conditioned/unfiltered. Anyways, dark as night with a solid, burnt tan head. Aroma gives away hints of rotten veggies at first, but as it warms and breathes, this turns in to a very deep underlying chocolate malt mixed with some smoked malt and salty roast. Flavor begins with a dose of salty, bacon like smoke, a big dose of rich dark coffee roast and moves in to a bit more of a sweet chocolate. Hops bitterness is not dominant, but is noticeable and provides good balance on the finish. Hints of licorice on the finish as well. Body begins with too much carbonation, my biggest complaint with this beer, but evens out as it sits. Because of the relatively high carbonation, the body comes across as medium to medium-full. The flavor, especially the roasty/smoky part is just divine though.


 Dickinsonbeer (3500), Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
3.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/103/513/20
Feb 1, 2008  
750 ml bottle poured by one of the brewers. Pours a nice depe dark brown with a foamy lasting lightish beige head. Aroma is nutty and chocolates with a higher amount of fruity esters than expected- dark candied fruits- prunes raisin and some apricot- ligth dusty earthy hops. Good dark chocolate malt flavor- nutty dry roastiness, more dry dusty earthy and spicy hops, and a bit on the sweet side though. Carbonation is a bit on the higher end. Pretty good porter, but probably not worth the $10+ price tag for a regular porter in a 750 ml bottle.


 Nuffield (2728), Roseville, Minnesota, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/57/103/514/20
Sep 28, 2002  
Roasted and slightly vinous aroma, bit of chocolate as well. Unexceptional appearance. Warmed up nicely, with some occasional bursts of flavor. Distinctly dry, mild bitter aftertaste. Slightly slippery, oily palate, but other times striking a watery tone. Decent porter (and thus well above average in the beer world) but didn’t thrill me. I liked the legal disclaimer on the back of the bottle--one that I hadn’t seen before: "Chart on front not meant for navigational purposes." Yeah, like some guys on a boat off of Massachusetts find themselves lost and one of them says, "hey, I know! We’ll use this Buzzard map on this bottle...."


 Gusler (2655), Tucson, Arizona, USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/104/515/20
Apr 12, 2002  
Re-Rate 04/12/02, Another Missing Beer? Pours a nice deep brown, the head beige, the nose is malt, slight toastyness, and some caramel tones also noted. Front is sweet malt, the top medium, the finish is dry and acidic, hops present, drinkable, and worth a try.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC