MTNMAN509 (14), Goleta, California, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Dec 3, 2002 I gave the higher rating for the appearance and the impression because I think the can is very humorous. The only plus to this shit is the high abv that will get you drunk fairly fast.
 PhillyBeer2112 (2086), Orange Park, Florida, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Nov 12, 2002 Pale gold, with small head, and correspondingly weak carbonation. Head faded immediately. Very weak sweetish aroma. Strongly sweet, rough flavor. Thankfully no weird off-notes or esters. Potent and cloying. Sampled from the big 40oz clear-glass bottle - yet no hint of skunking, which must be telling since there’s not much bitterness in this beer (i.e. barely any hops). Surprisingly not gross, eso for such high alcohol, but I couldn’t finish one glass, and I dumped the rest of the bottle.
grant (792), Long Beach, CA/Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Oct 31, 2002 Pretty bad, but gets its job done. They also sell this in 40 oz. bottles. One must be very wary of these! This is tolerable swill if you just chug it. The name kind of scares me though.
Schroppfy (1813), Ohio, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 29, 2002 sweet and artificail with a hint of malt. Pretty stick after a while. Also, well, pretty strong! I’ve had far worse.
FORTY DOGG (22), Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| 4.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 20/20 |
Oct 11, 2002 I believe this stuff is fairly new in the relm of malt liqordom, however I have fallen love this Hard-Hitting Shit, with 8.5% put on a camo style label, this stuff stands out among 40s in the cooler like a big-tittied girl with a fine ass in a room full of super-models, thats right, Ghetto eye candy! My only gripe is that Camo refers to this fine MALT beverage as ’Lager’, which is not only a an insult to lager, but a slap in the face of malt liquor as well. Camo should be as proud as I am of this cheap piss and have the spine to call it what it is!* Warning; Not for Bitches.
OldJack99 (114), USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Sep 30, 2002
BeermanLayton (33), Rohnert Park, California, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 20/20 |
Sep 12, 2002 Used to drink them all the time cause’ of the 8.5!! Better in a 40oz.
hennes (932), Fountain, Michigan, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Sep 11, 2002 You can easily duplicate this stuff if you dump several pounds of the cheapest malt extract you can find into a carboy full of rubbing alcohol. Seriously. And don’t even think about adding yeast - if they did survive the harsh environment enough to start working their magic, you’d get some carbonation and the makers of this stuff apparently want it flat as hell.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)