RateBeer
Captain Lawrence Smoke from the Oak (Wine Barrel) 3.78 227

Captain Lawrence Smoke from the Oak (Wine Barrel)

Percentile
97
overall

bottled
common

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
2273.81/5.03.78/5.06.4%98.7English pint, Stem glass
Commercial Description:
The marriage of beer and oak is a truly wonderful thing. Just like wine, whiskey or rum, beer can also gain in complexity when aged in oak barrels. But if you take it one step further and age the beer in oak barrels that had previously held word class wine, well then you can elevate the experience even higher. This is our Smoked Porter, aged in French oak barrels that were previously used to age Merlot and Pinot Noir. We let the beer age in the barrels for around 12 months before adding a fresh dose of yeast to allow the beer to naturally carbonate in the bottle.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 JCB (1799), Durham, North Carolina, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/104/514/20
May 25, 2008  
Bottle shared by emacgee at the Carolina crew gathering at Turd’s place. My second of the barrel-aged CL smoked porter (itself an awesome brew), and I’m somewhat surprised to say that I think the rum complements the base beer slightly better than the wine does. A handome brew, full bodied, deep and dark, with a substantial frothing head. Very yeasty aroma, lots of dark fruits, and - as you’d expect - quite heady and vinous. But while the wine flavors come across impressively and are enjoyable in their own right, I feel that - with their dry and occasionally a tad vegetal qualities - they overwrite the fine porter just a bit too much. Still good, but not the tops.


 Rciesla (3910), Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA
4.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/58/104/516/20
May 19, 2008  
Bottle. Pours a nice exploding eruption of beer all over the hands and surrounding company of the opener. haha and scotts warning is to late! were drenched but thats fine where at hop devil . Pours to the tenders and the 5 heads im with. This beer is fantastic. Pours dark brown thin nectar with ruby hues. Aroma/flavor is chocolate, funk, sour juice, and brett. Not much of the smoked porter here yet that is not a bad thing by any means. Just so drinkable i had to polish off the bottle myself, so dam good.


 FlacoAlto (2482), Tucson, Arizona, USA
4.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/58/104/518/20
May 16, 2008  
Batch 2; Sampled May 2008
I knew this might be a gusher and I still lost a couple ounces to my counter and sing. A soft pour still produces four-fingers of head in my glass plus another two fingers above the rim. The head is a tight, creamed-chocolate, tan color and the beer is a dark-chocolate brown / black color that is quite opaque even when held up to the light. As I pour this brew a nice wine-influenced aroma wafts to my nose. A deeper inspection yields ample Brettanomyces influence with notes of sweat, musty horse-blanket notes, butyric acid and a sharp-yet-light tartness. Underneath the more dominant funkiness is are some porter notes of toasted grain, lightly roasted coffee beans and if you smell the beer in a sideways sort of fashion (figuratively of course) there is a substantial, bright berry like wine character, a touch of jam and some leather and tobacco notes to this beer. The smoked malt aromatics have almost completely been subsumed by the other aromas, but there is perhaps a touch of saltiness here that could be attributed to it.

Lightly sweet tasting up front with a middle that has a nice berry-like wine character to it that just barely makes its presence known. A lot of the carbonation was lost during the initial gushing and in the 5+ minutes it has sat in my glass, it is still well carbonated though and this combines with a fairly light body to make this pretty easy drinking. The funk is a bit more muted in the flavor than in the aroma, but the Brett influence definitely comes out in the finish; musty, light notes of phenolic soaked cotton balls, butyric acid notes, some acidity that accentuates the wine character and a woody mushroom note. This finishes with a mix of fruit-driven wine flavors, and some porter flavors of toasted grain, roasted malts, toasted bread-like flavors and a touch of burnt grain bitterness. The actual oak contribution here is soft; there is some spicy oak character towards the finish, and a touch of tannic character seems to influence the texture, but it remains a supporting cast member here, which I quite like.

My second pour still has an incredible level of carbonation, this makes me realize how velvety the texture of this beer really is. Despite being very well carbonated the beer feels quite smooth and velvet-like all while foaming up as it crosses the tongue; quite an interesting textural experience that I don’t believe I have ever experienced in a beer before. I can’t taste any smokiness in this brew at all & I wonder if he left the smoke malt out of this brew completely.

This is by far my favorite of the from the oak beers so far. This doesn’t have any heavy-handed hard liquor competing with the funkiness that I really found jarring in the other two versions of this I have had. Instead the wine barrel influence works quite well with both the Brettanomyces and the base porter. I really like the fruit notes that the wine barrel aging have added to this beer, it is nothing heavy, but most certainly a welcome addition to up the complexity of this brew. Sans the slight wine influence, this is exactly as I would imagine an old, pre 1900s, unblended, stale porter would have been like (sans the modern malt formulation of course). This is just a great marriage of funkiness & barrel influence with porter. If it wasn’t so explosive already I would love to age some more of this. I definitely came into this with a bit of skepticism, but this has delivered and I am quite happy with this brew; this makes me really want to try the Port-Barrel version.


 theisti (1696), Leawood, Kansas, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/56/104/514/20
May 15, 2008    Updated: Jun 9, 2008
750 bottle Colin brought back from his trip to NYC. Batch 2. Shared with us at Uber Tavern in Seattle. Pour is deep dark brown ruby, smallish tan head. Aroma is mostly about the red wine, it is remarkable how much this smells like a Pinot Noir. Behind the wine is some roasted maltiness. Taste of sour sharp winey maltiness. Smoked roastiness. Interesting taste, but pretty divergent from a beer. Finish has sourness. An interesting experiment to be sure, but the end result was in a sort of no man’s land for me.


 after4ever (2857), Brier, Washington, USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/57/103/514/20
May 14, 2008  
750, capped. Batch 2. Thanks, Colin! Black. Dense but thin creamy tan head. Big red wine nose--smells simultaneously acetic and drying and also fruit-bomby. Perplexing. Maybe the fruits are from the malt? Nah. Medium body, sharp carb. Bit of a sour bite from all the acidity in the wine. Tastes almost bugged for a minute. Roasty malt base underneath, but kind of a mediocre porter. Fruity and sour on top of that. Like none other, to be sure, but doesn’t really seem to know what it wants to be, other than that it was in those wine barrels for a really long time.


 SuzyGreenberg (1411), Seattle, Washington, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/56/103/514/20
May 13, 2008    Updated: May 14, 2008
750 ml bottle, batch 2 - thanks so much to goldtwins for the trade; pours a fuzzy dark brown with big dark tan head; aromas are sort of a strange mix of a stale tartness and red wine; flavors are fruity, sweet and a little chewy; soft, fluffy texture; finish is dry and tart; a very odd beer overall and pretty much all characteristics of the porter are gone, especially the flavors; i haven’t had the regular porter to compare though; drank alongside the rum and bourbon editions and all three were rather disappointing; hope to try again when i stop by captain lawrence in late june


 Stine (1381), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
4.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/518/20
May 12, 2008  
Batch 2. Gushing. Oak brown pour. Thick film of ashy grey. Cherry and cassis notes in an aroma that gives a reserved but definite barrel suggestion. Caramel malts and some burly barbecue smokiness; the smoked quality seems more visceral given this softer touch of barrel presence. Malt presents more substantially as well; cinnamon and sugar, dark honey, bran cereal, fresh vanilla. Loveable subtlety and deep character there; where the bourbon barrel and brett of the last installment seemed, while intriguing and satisfying, too stark, the wine barrel seems the perfect compliment to the nuances of this already subtle arrangement. Oak tartness is the dominant flavor, which, again, imbued with the characters of wine seems unusually deep. Dark chocolate, mexican chocolate, tannins, lively currants and berries, and earthy, woodsy minerals. Maybe some citrus oils running through these thick cookie malts. So much full tartness and distinctive, polished malt character; flavors seem fully bonded to each other and so very velvety and understated. Palate is silken; medium to full in body and wholly round with this taut, caressing, cottony yeast texture. Sours up a bit quite nicely toward the end, lending a long, acidic cherry and sweet tobacco leaf flavor in a brisk, lightly dried finish. It would seem to be adventurous, but rather, it comes across more as a finely tuned example of a concept that’s been done with too little imagination too many times. Gorgeous. Thanks Andrew!


 GeneralGao (3081), Iowa City, Iowa, USA
4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/103/517/20
May 6, 2008  
Bottle generously shared by pepsican. Batch #2. Gusher. Poured an opaque black color with a light brown head. The aroma was a nice mixture of typical porter smells (chocolate, roast), red wine, and subdued vinegar. Light acidity up front. Slightly sweet and tarry at the end. Oak and red wine vinegar flavors predominated, but were accompanied by roasty malt and chocolate. The body was lighter than expected and I didn’t get much smoke in the nose or flavor. Good stuff.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC