 Lilith (242), Santiago, Chile
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Mar 24, 2006 BottleGolden and clear color with bubbles going up. It has a tiny white head that disappears quickly but leaves a fine lacing that descends slowly through the glass’ walls. It has a hoppy smell but nothing interesting whatsoever. Bitter and dull flavor <FONT SIZE=1>This was a gift from <a href= http://ratebeer.com/ViewUser.asp?UserID=7208> Sully thanks :D</FONT> <FONT SIZE=1>Bottle shared with <a href = "http://www.ratebeer.com/View-User-30044.htm& Panzerfaust </FONT>
TBone (6868), Pori, Finland
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Feb 25, 2006 Bottled
Golden color, small white head. Sweet, a bit fruity but light aroma. Light, carbonated. Sweet malty flavor. Leaves a bit sweet aftertaste. Good thirst-quencher, clean and uninspiring.
Monty84 (18), Perth, Australia
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jan 2, 2006 When you see the golden bottle with the fancy writing you get tricked into thinking that Crown Lager must be something really special. So when I actually tried this beer I was so disappointed. There isnt anything wrong with it, its quite a nice beer - its just that it isn’t anything out of the ordinary either. Its not really much better than Tooheys or VB. The only thing is that it seems to be a bit smoother and less bitter. Despite this Crown Lager is definitely over priced and should not be dubbed "Australia’s finest beer".
JonMoore (1562), Loughborough, Leicestershire, England
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Oct 31, 2005 Bottle. Golden colour with a slim white head. Some malt, some hops, some skunk in the aroma. Flavour was better than I was expecting, as in it had some. Sweet malts and light bitterness in the taste. Light body, moderate carbonation.
I can’t say as I would seek it out.
budman12 (10), USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 14, 2005 This is a very expensive Aussie beer. The beer just does not justify the price as any Aussie could tell you. It’s not like it’s here where a 12 of Michelob is only a couple of dollars more then a Bud 12. It’s a big difference between a VB 12 and a Crown Lager 12.
Besides the price it’s just a simple mass produced beer. There are better beers down under then this one.
Magicdave6 (5558), London, Greater London, England
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 8/20 |
Sep 5, 2005 reasonable flavour nothing really to taste though, and its too carbonated.
GarethYoung (1110), Glasgow, Scotland
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 |
Sep 5, 2005 [bottle from kirky puffer] aroma is slightly hoppy, but stale. fizzy body, tiny bit of bitterness in the finish, rubbish.
MorganDavis (17), Ballarat, Australia
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Sep 2, 2005 Hyped to all hell, but to me is indistinguishable from VB. The last time I was given one, it was warm. I drank it anyway and felt crook for half an hour or so.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)