Spiesy (2333), Global Citizen, Greater London, England
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Apr 21, 2004 Draught, at the Paddington Inn, Sydney. Pale yellow colour with bright white head. Bitter sweet aroma. Bitter flavour to begin with but then a long sweet aftertaste lingers on the palate. Drinking at extreme pace with some old mates, I haven’t yet made up my mind on this beer. All I do know is that the marketing of the stuff has gone crazy since I was last here. liams (8), Australia does not count | 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Mar 30, 2004 only new on the scene. not as refreshing as other beers, but its something different to drink every now and again. not on my top 10, thats for sure. SimonLarsen (210), Sydney, Australia
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 26, 2004 Head fades away quickly leaving a pale dead beer. No real sign of these special hops they claim to have used, there is an absence of the wet dog hops I am finding in most of the aussie lagers though so that is good. Only reason not to be one for all categories is that it doesn't actually have a bad aftertaste or anything, I regard a 3 overall to be roughly the right price, image etc and not actively offensive. This beer has an image and price problem. Winefly (60), KEW, Australia
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Feb 3, 2004 I have given this brew a couple of chances, yet everytime it disapoints more. Have tried it super cold, cold and cool, but even at its coldest it makes no impact! As for the palate...none to excite ones self about, the appearance is worse. The flavour is not too bad, but could have been better. It seems as if the beer was made in a rush with its main focus on impact packaging for the young crowd. I think that CUB have wasted heaps of cash on this one. Winchester (75), Struggle Town NSW, Australia
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Jan 26, 2004 Some mates had wraps on this stuff, so I thought Id give it a chance. Its drinkable. Trogdor (193), brisbane, Australia
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 29, 2003 another horrible aussie lager, how do cub get away with continually releasing stuff like this?? winkle (453), Brisbane, Australia
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 23, 2003 I'd have to agree with the others, just the same shite in a different bottle. A faint suggestion of stale hops,chemicals and adjunct in the nose. A watery light gold colour, Flavour is initially of malt and adjuncts then... nothing.
A sorry excuse of a beer. I am very glad not to have paid for this slop. KBeer (117), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Nov 30, 2003 I was pissed out of my mind when I tried this one, and I still new it was bad. I got a free bottle at the Post Office night club in Perth for some reason and don't plan to sample it again in any state of sobriety or drunkeness.
|