RateBeer
Carlton Premium Dry 1.71 46

Carlton Premium Dry

Percentile
2
overall
Brewed by Carlton & United Breweries (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
461.56/5.01.71/5.05%15.7Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Easy drinking style. Brewed using the best malted barley and soft bittering hops. Has a naturally, crisp, clean finish.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 Nemo (100), Fremantle, Australia
2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/54/102/59/20

Jun 29, 2004  
Yellowish in colouring with a small white cloudy head. Tinnie, malty sort of aroma. Bland in flavour with a hint of fruity, almost bittery taste. Although the beer is Crisp and clean, its got nothing much else to offer.

 mkel07 (562), Brisbane, Australia
2.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/56/103/510/20
Jul 25, 2009  
355ml bottle. Amber honey colour that is clear and mildly carbonated and does not have much of a head, almost flat looking. Hard to detect any aroma, just a hint of malt poking through. Tastes of custard powder and banana and is light and dry in the mouth.


 NoiZe (1382), Mooi Zeist, Netherlands
1.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/54/102/56/20
Jun 21, 2009  
Had this one during my holiday in Australia april/may 2009. Golden, orange colored brew. No aroma. Watery, dry, bitterness, dusty, dull aftertaste.


chrismwpcs (73), South Hedland, Australia
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Dec 12, 2007  
You have to be fucking kidding me surely? Either I have drank too much piss in my life or this garbage is passed off as some kind of weird brew apparently labeled beer? I would not even try to kill cane toads with this shit as it is would be inhumane.


 bridge (659), Sydney, Australia
1.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/53/102/54/20
Sep 28, 2007  
The essential beer in every macro range these days is the premium dry lager coming in a clear elongated bottle. Carlton’s version tastes like most of the other pale lagers in it’s repertoire, with the differences so subtle that I’m sure I couldn’t pick them in a blind tasting. In fact, I probably couldn’t pick them even in a side by side tasting. I can’t say that this is a particularly dry beer, but it isn’t as sickly sweet and say a VB. Tasted a bit of cleaning product along with a good dose of corn. It really is pretty poor and, from memory, even worse than TED.


pyrotim2000 (13), Australia
1.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/53/102/56/20
Nov 26, 2006  
I found this beer very boring to drink. The head diminished quickly but never fully disapeared, the carbonation was barely there and it didn’t lace the glass at all... It smelt a bit musky and there was a slight taste of hops. Anyway I’m still learning so don’t take my rating too seriously.


DrunkenCumquat (86), Canberra, Australia
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/102/54/102/55/20
Sep 1, 2005  
Bottled. Thirst-quenching and drinkable, nondescipt and pretty tasteless, like a dry should be I suppose. About a hair different from Toohey’s Extra Dry. Well, I guess by CUB standards it’s a balltearer.


 ALLOVATE (1126), Perth, Australia
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/103/51/102/51/20
Aug 8, 2005  
Hope I have the right beer as there was nothing sweet in the aroma or flavour of this one to give it any life. Tasted from the bottle (355ml, 4.5% ABV) and poured into a tallboy. Clear pale gold, with irregular carbonation holding up a decent fluffy white head, that lasted and left foam lacing down the glass. Appearance was alright, but the beer was not. I had just tasted a Boag’s St. George and this suffered from the same adjunct ridden, yeast infected aroma. Corn, DMS boiled vegie’ water and a sour hop note that turned my stomach. Thankfully it was quite clean in the mouth, but the aroma still lingered. Feather weight in body and biting in carbonation, with an acrid ’Tonic water’ and cardboard feel that left little to impress. Anything detected on the tongue was that light on that it borderlined on tasteless, and the crisp dry finish left me wondering if I was drinking beer at all. The only good point to this beer was that the liquor used was extremely clean. Another embarrassing marketing blunder by yet another macro ’bean counter’.


 highlandlad (1278), Sydney, Australia
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/55/20
Aug 5, 2005  
"Premium ingredients... chill filtering... perfectly balanced... crisper, drier and sharper..." Bloody marketing-speak. Presumably this was dreamed up to counter Toohey’s bizarrely popular Dry. Why bother. Pale gold, skinny vanishing head. Standard CUB nose - POR hops, soapy wet dog. Sweet and malty with a barely-there finish. Lemonade-like spritz. Not especially dry.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC