 duff (5475), Surrey, Greater London, England
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Nov 10, 2001 this beer definitely sucked arse, as eczematic said, absoluetly no flavour whatsoever, terrible. don’t bother with this one honestly, it will only end in dissapointment....bloooohhhhr!
motelpogo (4395), Plzen, Czech Republic
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 8, 2001 really don’t know why i tried this
DuffMan (2767), the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, Canada
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 25, 2005 Pale golden, clear, medium head. I wouldn’t go so far as calling this "foul", but it is pretty boring. Sweet malt is really all you get for flavour (the same as all corn-adjunct, over-processed pale lagers on the market). I wouldn’t choose to drink it again if an alternative were available, but I wouldn’t turn it down if the beerfridge was empty on a Friday night. This is my standard review for all "two-star-or-less" piss.
Spiesy (2333), Global Citizen, Greater London, England
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Apr 21, 2004 Bottled, with Sats, in Sydney. Cats piss yellow an unable to maintain a head. Rancid corn aroma and flavour, not even particularly dry. Absolute rubbish in a bottle.
bluevegie (2215), Perth, Australia
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
May 22, 2004 Pale straw colour with a frothy white head and good lacing. Hop aroma. Not a lot of taste, thin, a touch of lemon and a touch of banana and not much else.
NoiZe (1372), Mooi Zeist, Netherlands
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jun 21, 2009 Had this one during my holiday in Australia april/may 2009. Golden, orange colored brew. No aroma. Watery, dry, bitterness, dusty, dull aftertaste.
Sully (1367), Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Jun 18, 2003 Anything described as 'dry' is going to be short on mouthfeel and body. Also it lacks balance as the bitterness is not matched by the malt, so even though they have used the best malted barley CUB decided to add some additional adjuncts to ferment the taste out of the beer. Well done lads, you have succeeded
highlandlad (1268), Sydney, Australia
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Aug 5, 2005 "Premium ingredients... chill filtering... perfectly balanced... crisper, drier and sharper..." Bloody marketing-speak. Presumably this was dreamed up to counter Toohey’s bizarrely popular Dry. Why bother. Pale gold, skinny vanishing head. Standard CUB nose - POR hops, soapy wet dog. Sweet and malty with a barely-there finish. Lemonade-like spritz. Not especially dry.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)