 mullet (801), Melbourne, Australia
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Nov 28, 2004 Left behind at my place by a mate - another rating, woo hoo! Looks decent enough. Grass and metal aroma. Tastes like lightly hopped soda water with little to no sweetness. Dominant flavour is that of carbonation. As it warms it gets a bit funky with a cocoa aroma and a distinct banana topping flavour. Tastes alright when it’s cold from the bottle. I think I like CUB’s light beers better than their heavy stuff.
dreamboat (186), Brisbane, Australia
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Aug 5, 2004 I can’t believe that I even asked for this beer. I suppose that it serves me right that it was no good. Aroma of practically nothing, a hint of hop, and a hint of apple sweetness. This body, with not much flavour, but a slightly harsh bitterness. Generally Crap.
bluevegie (2222), Perth, Australia
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
May 21, 2004 Pale golden colour with a very average head. Light hoppy nose. Metallic hoppy taste that was slightly soapy and a bit watery.
Spiesy (2333), Global Citizen, Greater London, England
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Apr 18, 2004 Updated: Apr 19, 2004Bottled, in Sydney. Clear amber coloured body with a fine white head. Thin bitter aroma. Thin flavour. With the tyranny that governs this nation and the vast distances people travel by car, there’s strong subclass of beers with only half the strength of the regular beers. You can’t help but pick them up. This was one of those sad half-caste creations.
liams (8), Australia
does not count  | 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Mar 30, 2004 This is a premium LIGHT beer. Thats its only major fall.. its a light. Its reasonably priced, and not a bad drop.
Winefly (60), KEW, Australia
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Feb 13, 2004 No way will I repeat my purchase here. It was not a good choice, but still gave me a debate with a good friend who loves it! Shows that we are all in fact different hey! Maybe that yankee beer was not as bad as I thought after all! It had no taste, or flavour, left nothing to sing about at all really.
theread (51), Wagga Wagga, Australia
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Dec 30, 2003 I had some of this at the cricket because the only other alternative was VB, and that must be avoided at all costs. This rates lower than VB because it is a light, but it did have a bitter, metallic taste that is preferable to me than the bile of VB. In saying the above, it is the usual crap tasting CUB effort. They are a blight on brewing in this country and the world as a whole.
Trogdor (193), brisbane, Australia
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Dec 29, 2003 another rubbish product from cub, why oh why do people continue to buy their products? a light version of crown basicly.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)