philb (20), Wangaratta, Australia
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | May 8, 2003 Drinkable, like chlorinated water is. I think the label belies one of it's ingredients (aluminium sulphide). Betty (234), Walgett, NSW, Australia
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | May 7, 2003 If John Denver himself were to reincarnate as a beer, there would be only a very few more appropriate choices. motelpogo (4394), Plzen, Czech Republic
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Apr 29, 2003 failed to take my breath away. for people who find the complexity of flavours in fosters light ice a little too confronting LoveABeer (141), Melbourne, Australia
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Apr 27, 2003 No Aroma, No Taste! Golden colored water with a hint of corn. Nice looking bottle though! mutant (854), Melbourne, Australia
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Apr 20, 2003 Smells slightly of hop extract. Slight corn taste. So light it could float away. I would say this is very waterered down version of Carlton Crown Lager. For the rating only, sad really. Sully (1367), Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Apr 2, 2003 Updated: May 15, 2003Bit of a worry when you only have to change one of the default ratings. OK I know this is a light beer but that does not excuse the lack of essential features of a good beer. Sure it looks OK but it all goes downhill when you get close enough to smell and taste it. Some 'kind' soul left it at my place after a barbecue and so I could at least try it for free. Wasn't worth the money. It is insipid, aromaless and thin. The only thing it has a lot of is carbonation and an acidic afterburn. grant60 (185), Perth, Australia
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Mar 25, 2003 this stuff is crap but it is the best light beer around (which doesn't say much for light beer). i would sum this up as a watery weak carlton draught. I despise the advertising campaign. damirvrkic (55), Franklin ACT, Australia
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 12, 2003 Since when double hopping delivers full flavoured lagers. Try adding some malt and forget about beer adjuncts like sugar and rice. Let me guess, carlton added 2 gms of hop extract instead of 1. Whoohoo - double hopping. Bloody hell this is the worst type of marketing I've ever seen. The beer is water and in fact water tastes better than this. I laugh at all the drinkers who drink this and stare at the ceiling of a bar and think they are in heaven. Yuppies, I hate 'em!
|