DocLock (4648), Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Apr 26, 2005 Another house beer from Carolina Ale House in Cary. Gold pour with aroma and taste of malt, some hopcit, and finishing honey crispness. Earlier Rating: 4/25/2005 Total Score: 1.7 Pale gold pour with slight hopcit aroma. Not much taste, with some hopcit. Bland. GeneralGao (3073), Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 | Jan 2, 2006 Draught.Clear golden color. The head was gone by the time it came to the table. Subtle citrus hop flavor and taste. Crisp finish with honey/buttery aftertaste. Not bad. arventresca (343), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Mar 8, 2009 You have to rate it based on style and this is a pretty decent light beer. Not as bad as some of those macros out there, but you must remember, it is still a light beer. UNCCTF (465), Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Apr 13, 2003 Updated: Apr 30, 2003Little to no hint of the Carolina Blonde that it's allegedly modeled after. Decent for a light beer, but it's still not a whole lot more than beer-flavored water. biznizness (956), Mooresville, North Carolina, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Nov 9, 2006 Pretty decent light beer. The only Carolina Blonde for me is NEEZY (with her hair died blonde). She is my Carolina Brunette. But this is a pretty tasty light beer, IMO. kiefdog (1639), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Jun 29, 2008 Tasted on a recent visit to Woods on South in Charlotte, NC. Generally light in color with a very thin white head that dissipates to nothing. Aroma is very faint, some wheat present. Very little flavor to this beer with a slightly bitter finish. Reasonable for a light beer. Uglyradio (776), Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 29, 2003 I'm not much for light beers. This particular one pours a cloudy, pale golden color with particles of yeast? floating in it. The aroma is slightly hoppy without any malty sweetness. It has a light body up front, which turns into bland ,watery nothingness in the finish. The flavor is just slightly malty up front. The finish is bland, tasteless, and watery. 19641948 (491), Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 10/20 | Sep 4, 2006 From notes 5/17/03:
Wow, is this a big waste of time. Cape Hatteras lighthouse on the label. Proclaims to be 70 calories and 2 grams of carbs. We’ll see if taste, aroma, and character are also on the extremely lower end of the scale. Is this even a color? This looks like this is watered down lemonade with a bunch of melted ice cubes in it for good measure. You wouldn’t want to have COLOR in a beer would ya? A soda pop white head dissolves into nothing. No lacing. The beer looks hazy and cloudy. Dirty dishwater. The aroma stinks. Corny, yet sugary. The taste is effervescent and biting. A crispness that you do NOT want to have in a beer. Thin mouthfeel. Nasty aftertaste. Nasty burps.
|