FROTHINGSLOSH (2006), GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/20 | May 5, 2005 Updated: Jun 26, 2006I have not tried this one before and certainly had not been missing much. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a medium golden color with a small white head. The aroma is lightly skunky and vegetal. The flavor is lightly malty with a sour tang finish. jgentgesdo (564), Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Apr 4, 2005 Pours pale yellowwith fizzy white head. Nose is faint sourness. The flavor is artificial... adjunct (corn), sour off notes, ketotic. No aftertaste. Not good. Nuffield (2724), Roseville, Minnesota, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Mar 30, 2005 Oh yeah, this is the good stuff. Not. It pours normal enough--yellow and fizzy. And the aroma isn’t terrible--sweet corn and a bit of skunk, but mostly just a boring lager (nothing too offensive). The flavor was more problematic, with a lot of cardboard, a quick finish, and a overall composition that left a watery, unhappy finish in my mouth. I drank the whole bottle, so at least it isn’t a drainpour, but it is still pretty bad. KAggie97 (2452), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Mar 19, 2005 Typical Mexican swill that goes good with lime, horrible sans lime. Cheap stuff. hellomynameis (794), Mayer, Minnesota, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Mar 18, 2005 Eh...This was okay. Fairly standard lager, nothign too impressive. It is fairly smooth, and is a good compliment to spicy food. However, it is nothing memorable, and not worth seeking. DavidTarantino (7), TIJUANA, Mexico does not count | 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 5/5 | 12/20 | Mar 2, 2005 sucks but is very cheap, and it gets you really drunk .... but thats it , ohh and dont get any sun with this beer it will get you crazy donrajin (233), Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Feb 27, 2005 A very light flavored beer. Not bad to wash down the hot stuff, but thats about all. Tastes like a better Bud (which ain’t nothing to brag about, but at least it’s not the worse). Not one of my favorite Mexican picks. desurfer (1067), Pinellas Park, Florida, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Feb 18, 2005 Yee haw, another pale lager. Sure doesn’t taste like 6% alcohol. It’s basically a Bud with a bit more hoppiness, but the finish is sour and somewhat stale.
|