JPDIPSO (4926), Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Nov 17, 2003 Light golden color with a soft off white head. Light floral and malt aromas. Repeat light. Light sweetness thoughout that seems to build as you continue. heemer77 (4311), Savannah, Missouri, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Nov 10, 2003 Updated: Feb 15, 2004Nice light lager. Great summer beer. Better than Corona. Not much head and has a little fruity taste. Reid (1092), Salem, Oregon, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Nov 9, 2003 Ok bought in the 12 oz dark amber coloured bottle..again I liked the nice simple label.
Appearance as it pours into my mug is average,,darkish gold colour with a small whute head that goes fast to be replaced by a smallish ring of lace.
I actually liiked the aroma,,along with the usual lager type hops and malts i detect something rather more fruity..almost white wine like..
This beer has a nice taste swet and spritzy for a start then a little more substantial near the end..i even get a nice but barelly noticable bitterness..well done.
pretty average on the palate..not dry at all
I would say this is another very drinkable lighter beer for the summer months foduck (304), Denton, Texas, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Nov 2, 2003 Like Budweiser but superior. Came in a kickass one-quart bottle, not twistoff. This will probably be my cheap quart of choice from now on. Sweet and starchy up front, tiniest twist of hop in the finish. Still a bland lager, but somewhat better than the others. By the way, my label looks totally different; it says "Beer Carta Blanca Caguama" ToadMan (554), Washington, Washington DC, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Oct 1, 2003 Thin slightly golden color, slightly hopped aroma. Like Bud only with a touch more hoppieness to it and maybe a hint of citrus. thedm (3836), Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 | Aug 31, 2003 This brew poured a medium head of fine to medium sized white mostly lastin bubbles that left behind a fair lacing and a softly carbonated transparent orange colored body. It hd a mild malt aroma if it had any aroma at all! Its mild malt hop flavor was nothing special and its mouthfeel was smooth and thin from start to finish. hotstuff (3175), Indiana, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 | Aug 31, 2003 Not much going on with this beer that's for sure. It lacks character and it was boring to drink and rate.Its appearance was that of a medium white creamy head that contained fine-small sized bubbles that quickly dissipated.The body was clear and uncarbonated with a golden hue.The nose was malty as was the flavor.The mouthfeel was medium bodied and this beer's lacing was fair. whaleman (2171), North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 22, 2003 Aroma of old lemons. Taste of chalk, lemons, and water. Palate... chalk again. Horrid aftertaste. This was rather tortuous to finish. Surprisingly bad.
|