mrB33r (17), Norway
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 21, 2007 A truly terrible lager. Please people, never buy this, so we can try to rid our pubs and bars of this xxxxing disgraceful australian effort. Stopherbomber (111), London, England
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Mar 2, 2007 aussie beer brewed in the uk, its fairly shite but its cheap and drinkable. tastes better after a few. larsniclas (3386), Gothenburg, Sweden
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Mar 2, 2007 Canned
Golden. Huge white head.
Pungent, sweetish aroma.
Ok maltiness with notes of sweet licorice. berkshirejohn (1826), Bracknell, Berkshire, England
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Feb 19, 2007 440ml Can. Gold with a trace of white head; chemicla aroma, with traces of artificial sweeteners; tastes like Irn-Bru (a carbonated beverage popular in Scotland). Apparently this is "brewed using imported...hops from Australia" - so I guess they must have been mixed with some pretty crappy hops from somewhere else - for alternatively Australian hops aren’t very good.
I thought I’d never say this but "I’d rather have a Fosters". HarryFlashman (469), Chatham, Kent, England
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Nov 26, 2006 Updated: Nov 27, 2006Rubbish - Sweetish, amber in colour, weak and no taste. Would give Foster’s, Carling and Carlsberg a run for their money in the shitness stakes! Some people (rightly) refer to Australians as "cons"; I say the pretence that this substance is a lager is, in itself, a "con"! Australians can play cricket, but they should accept that their wines are horrible and they can’t make beer. In the advert for this dross, some con claims: "Australians wouldn’t give a XXXX for any other beer!". I think a more apt advert idea would be for some fat, blonde, sweaty old Aussie (i.e. Shane Warne) to pour some Castelmaine on the "barbie" (BBQ) and exclaim: "Even kangaroos/abos/koalas/poms [*delete as appropriate] wouldn’t drink this XXXX [shit]!" If this filth is what the convicts serve up in their pubs, old Steve (sting-ray) Irvine had a lucky escape! Crikey!!!! rw4244 (128), Bristol, Gloucestershire, England
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Oct 30, 2006 Can 50cl. Pouerd a watery pale gold with a wispy, weak head that quickly fades. Dull aroma of sweet hops. Very basic flavour of hops, but dominated by a watery taste. You are left with a slightly acidic oily citrus taste, but not for long. The palate is thin. Average cheap macrobrew lager. DruncanVeasey (2746), The Penguin’s Arms, Europe, Warwickshire, England
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Sep 30, 2006 You know your evening’s been a bit of a disappointment when this is the best thing you’ve sampled. Thinnish and headless, but some surprisingly OK smoky malt and a faintly bready aftertaste. Even a vaguely woody sourness/dryness. The hops have not been completely destroyed. Can this really be XXXX? jehoey (766), Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Sep 19, 2006 Updated: Aug 25, 2007pint @club: Shite. Very poor lager. Crap gasoline flavor. nuff said. I didn’t like it at all. Stay away from this stuff
|