 RSRIZZO (1345), Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
Sep 23, 2007 Had this beer in 5/2/1998. Color is a bright gold with good carbonation and head. Aroma is just a light malt scent. Taste is light with a fair amount of bitterness on the end. It starts with a light body that goes down a little creamy. The Finish is pretty clean leaving you with a light hop bitterness but no hop flavor. Its very drinkable but does not fully fit as a pale ale. After a while the finish leaves you with a flat taste.
wshores (57), Saltillo, Texas, USA
Sep 11, 2007 I still have a full bottle of this from a long damn time ago. Somewhat harsh but not any worse than other pale ales.
noons (4), Dallas, Texas, USA
does not count  Sep 8, 2003 I was reeled in but it turned out to be decent. An ok pale ale. I would probably buy some again.
khayman70 (154), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Dec 19, 2002 This was an okay brew, nothing special. Drinkable. Right down the middle on this one.
omhper (12155), Stockholm, Sweden
Feb 25, 2002 Orange coloured. Creamy, nutty. Pale ale in the English style.
igneous1 (1374), Davenport, Iowa, USA
Feb 24, 2002 pretty darned herbal...not much here
legion242 (1572), Richardson, Texas, USA
Sep 4, 2001 Clint Eastwood should stick to movies.
PhillyBeer2112 (2084), Orange Park, Florida, USA
Aug 12, 2000 I suppose this beer is meant to be a pale ale -
and in drinking it, thats what it comes closest
too, but its quite lifeless and not very
hoppy. Still, it tastes fairly good. Perhaps
treat it as an introduction to pale ales for the
hop novice who wants to start slowly.
|
