RateBeer
Charles Reibenbach Lager 1.62 18

Charles Reibenbach Lager

Percentile
0
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
181.13/5.01.62/5.0-3.5Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
No commercial description
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 BückDich (4857), McCall, Idaho, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/53/102/55/20
Oct 16, 2004  
Can: Clear watery fizz, very light straw yellow. Nose of corn, fusel alcohols, grainy, floral hops. A metallic sharp watery taste with mild grainyness. Fairly boring and not fun. Booo!


 PorterPounder (3147), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/54/20
May 17, 2003  
A quick Google search found nobody famous by this name - not surprising! Light head, quickly dissipating. Light golden in appearance. Aroma - that patented Gluek twang - slighty sour and yeasty. No real flavor - just that yeasty twang and a lot of carbonation. The black can is kind of cool though - have to give them credit for that!


 nick76 (2684), Tampa, Florida, USA
0.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/101/52/101/53/20
Jan 3, 2005    Updated: Oct 4, 2006
Sweet and somewhat sour. Very light golden yellow in appearance. Watered down taste. Cheap beer with a cheap taste.


 Aurelius (2654), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
1.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/101/54/20
Apr 11, 2003    Updated: Apr 29, 2003
Slight crackery, peppery lager aroma. Lackluster packaging, medium-pale gold beer with tall webby head that clings to the glass as it dies off. No hops, tartish and it loses almost all fizz immediately. Watery. If this were 7% ABV, then there might be some slight redemption, but as it stands it's just cheap, bad beer.


 Vac (2394), San Diego, California, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/51/102/54/20
Jun 29, 2004  
This liquid has a piss colored body with little head or lacing. Umm...the aroma is sweet and somewhat well-balanced leaning towards malty with notes of corn syrup. There’s practically no flavor at all. What is there is slightly sweet and malty with a corn syrup note. Very light bodied, watery and smooth.


 mjg74 (2000), La Mesa, California, USA
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/103/51/101/52/20
Aug 7, 2004  
Tastes pretty lousy. It has a weird taste like some malt liquors, but lacks the kick or the strength. Was $3.99 for a twelver, so I don’t feel too bad. The cans do look cool though.


 Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/52/101/54/20
Oct 16, 2004  
Pale yellow. Fizzy head. Nose of sweet malts and lemony citrus hops. Slight hint of corn. Wow. That isn’t very stimulating at all. Sour grains and slightly bitter citrus flavors. Watery. No discernable palate whatsoever. I concur with Jordo on this one. BOOOO! or something.


 21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/102/52/101/54/20
Nov 4, 2001  
This truly tasted like water. Much better than its brother beer freddy scholz. What the hell is with the names of these any way all three types are like a guys full name. Are these real people from old europe? Anyway, for the price its better than natty light which is the only beer as cheap as this. As I try to finish this I have to slightly alter my opinion. This is about as ass bad as ass can be. 2nd only to scholz.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC