 punkeedo (465), San Antonio, Texas, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 5/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 24, 2004 Wow! This NA packs a punch. The aroma is somewhat skunky, so when you taste it, your tastebuds are taken aback. It has a complex taste that is somewhat nutty and malty. The aftertaste is somewhat bitter, but you get used to it. This really is not that bad of a "beer". I think O’doul’s has a much better taste--but the aftertaste of O’doul’s is really watered down. Warsteiner Premium Fresh doesn’t even compare to this one in the flavor area and isn’t close to as complex. This is a pretty darn good NA.
DocLock (4648), Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 15, 2004 Another horrible low alcohol beer. Dark straw color, with slight sroma of malt and hops...very slight. I tasted some malt and sour hops at the finish, but not much.
Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Jul 12, 2004 Amber pour with a light white head that dissapates quickly. No lace. Sharp aromas of hops and light pils malts. Flavor is sour and fairly offensive. Stale hops and malts. Lingering finish that’s rather unpleasent.
duff (5475), Surrey, Greater London, England
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jul 12, 2004 Bottle. Normally i’d be in a desperate situation if i was trying non-alcoholic lagers. In this case i wasn’t desperate or anything, dad just had one in his fridge, so i figured i’d grab another rate and save myself buying this beer further down the track. It was one of the worst beers i’ve ever had, flat, lactic and totally void of any pleasing flavours (there wasn’t a lot of flavour anyway).
harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Jul 9, 2004 This was not really bad for a NA. Has a bit of a crisp harsh bite, with just a taint of hops. Not terrible but not something I would drink again.
cstuartj (326), Washington, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Jul 7, 2004 Not bad as NA beers go. I’d take an O’douls Amber over this one any day of the week though, if I was drinking an NA beer that is. Which I almost never am.
emotv (331), Izmir, Turkey
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 29, 2004 Non Alcoholic beer.Had a nice taste for a light beer.Good for drinking at lunch time.Better than Cola :-).In the heat of Izmir the new import beer makes me smile.
Bryght (17), California, USA
| 4.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 9/10 | 5/5 | 18/20 |
Jun 21, 2004 The best NA beer on the market today (this is limited to what I can import of course!). Not only does the taste take you back to Oktoberfest, but the color and head are reminiscent of the greatest of German brewed creations. A superb refreshment that is never far from my lips. Also, of all current NA beers in the world - Clausthaler Premium has the LOWEST rated carbohydrates at 5.8! Drink up, eh!
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)